Abstract:Switch costs are defined as the phenomenon that bilinguals have worse performance in switch trials relative to non-switch trials. Bilinguals' naming language and switch predictability have been found to influence the magnitude of switch costs. However, how these two factors modulate switch costs in different phases (i.e., lemma activation and language selection) during language production remains unclear. Most previous studies using the language switching paradigm did not dissociate lemma activation from language selection, because the language cue was either presented simultaneously with or prior to a stimulus. Therefore, here we modified the language switching paradigm by presenting a digit stimulus prior to a visual cue. This allowed us to dissociate lemma activation from language selection, and thus we were able to investigate the mechanisms underlying the effects of naming language and switch predictability on switch costs during the two different phases in language production. Unbalanced Indonesian-Chinese bilinguals were required to name digits in either their L1 (Indonesian) or L2 (Chinese), and their reaction times and electrophysiological responses were recorded. The behavioral results showed the effects of switch predictability on switch costs, with responses in switch trials being slower than those in non-switch trials in the low switch predictability condition, while there was no significant difference in response times between switch trials and non-switch trials in the high switch predictability condition. The event-related potential results showed that neither naming language nor switch predictability affected switch costs during the lemma activation phase, but both did so during the language selection phase, particularly at the language task schema competition stage. The results imply that naming language and switch predictability affect switch costs mainly during the language task schema competition stage.

No compelling evidence for a bilingual advantage in switching or that frequent language switching reduces switch cost

There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing

Shifting Gear in the Study of the Bilingual Advantage: Language Switching Examined as a Possible Moderator

Ecological Validity in Bilingualism Research and the Bilingual Advantage

Executive Processes Underpin the Bilingual Advantage on Phonemic Fluency: Evidence From Analyses of Switching and Clustering

Predictions about the Cognitive Consequences of Language Switching on Executive Functioning Inspired by the Adaptive Control Hypothesis Fail More Often than Not

Assessing the Evidence for Asymmetrical Switch Costs and Reversed Language Dominance Effects - A Meta-Analysis

Effects of Naming Language and Switch Predictability on Switch Costs in Bilingual Language Production

ERP Correlates of a Receptive Language-Switching Task

Cognitive Advantage in Bilingualism

Is there a bilingual advantage on interference-control tasks? A multiverse meta-analysis of global reaction time and interference cost

Electrophysiological Evidence for Domain-General Inhibitory Control during Bilingual Language Switching

The Role of Cognitive Development and Strategic Task Tendencies in the Bilingual Advantage Controversy

The Roles of Relative Linguistic Proficiency and Modality Switching in Language Switch Cost: Evidence from Chinese Visual Unimodal and Bimodal Bilinguals

Bilingualism and the executive function trade-off: A latent variable examination of behavioral and event-related brain potentials.

Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children

A Bilingual Advantage? An Appeal for a Change in Perspective and Recommendations for Future Research

Latent variable evidence on the interplay between language switching frequency and executive control in Spanish-Catalan bilinguals

Cultural Effects Rather Than a Bilingual Advantage in Cognition: A Review and an Empirical Study

Exploring the bilingual advantage: manipulations of similarity and second language immersion in a Stroop task

Bilingual disadvantages are systematically compensated by bilingual advantages across tasks and populations