Interprofessional collaboration in fluid teams: an ethnographic study in a Dutch healthcare context
F. van Heteren N. Raaphorst S.M. Groeneveld M. Bussemaker a Health Campus The Hague,Leiden University Medical Centre,The Hague,The Netherlandsb Institute of Public Administration,Faculty of Governance and Global Affairs,Leiden University,The Hague,The NetherlandsFia van Heteren is a PhD candidate in Medical Anthropology at both the Leiden University Medical Centre and the Institute of Public Administration,Leiden University,the Netherlands. Her research focuses on health conceptions,professional identity,roles and values,and interprofessional collaboration.Nadine Raaphorst is an assistant professor at the Institute of Public Administration,Leiden University,The Netherlands. Her research is focused on professionals' decision-making where it affects citizens most: at the ground level of government where services are provided to citizens. She focuses particularly on research questions related to fairness of decision-making,such as discrimination and equal treatment.Sandra Groeneveld is Professor in Public Management at the Institute of Public Administration,Leiden University,the Netherlands. She specializes in leadership,organizational change,teamwork,and diversity,equity,and inclusion in public organizations.Jet Bussemaker is Professor in Policy,Science and Societal Impact at both the Leiden University Medical Center and the Institute of Public Administration,Leiden University,the Netherlands. She specializes in public governance,policy learning and social inequality. Apart from her academic position she is also Chair of the National Council of Public Health & Society.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2433190
2024-12-06
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Abstract:In caring for clients with combined problems, various professionals are encouraged to work together in new ways. Collaboration is often fluid, and professionals are expected to seek other professionals and organizations to solve complex problems. This type of collaboration is not institutionalized; it may therefore be hard to develop routines compared to fixed teams. Knowledge about how frontline professionals work together in non-institutionalized forms of fluid collaboration is lacking. This article addresses this gap by studying how professionals from various disciplines work together in fluid collaborative contexts when caring for clients with combined problems. To this end, this empirical research has an iterative design and uses ethnographic fieldwork in studying these hard-to-grasp contexts. In the analysis, we explore whether and how interprofessional collaboration manifests in fluid teams in general practice, mental healthcare and social welfare a Dutch city and how team fluidity plays a role.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services