Nanostructured molybdenum oxide in a 3D metal organic framework and in a 2D polyoxometalate network for extraction of chlorinated benzenes prior to their quantification by GC–MS

Habib Bagheri,Faezeh Karimi Zandian,Hasan Javanmardi,Alireza Abbasi,Tahereh Golzari Aqda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-018-3070-5
IF: 5.7
2018-11-09
Microchimica Acta
Abstract:<h3 class="a-plus-plus">Abstract</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">A three–dimensional metal organic framework (3D–MOF) and a two–dimensional polyoxometalate (2D–POM), both incorporating nanostructured molybdenum (VI) oxide, were synthesized and implemented for headspace needle trap extraction of traces of chlorobenzenes (CBs). The 3D–MOF of type {(Mo<sub class="a-plus-plus">2</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">6</sub>)(4,4′–bpy)}<sub class="a-plus-plus">n</sub> and the 2D–POM of type [4,4′–bpy][Mo<sub class="a-plus-plus">7</sub>O<sub class="a-plus-plus">22</sub>] were synthesized by a solvothermal process and characterized by FT–IR, powder X–ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, thermogravimetry, energy dispersive X–ray, elemental mapping and Brunner–Emmet–Teller adsorption analyses. The 3D–MOF proved to be superior. Following thermal desorption, the CBs (monochlorobenzene, 1,4–dichlorobenzene, 1,2–dichlorobenzene, 1,2,4–trichlorobenzene and 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene) were quantified by GC–MS. Under optimized conditions, the calibration plots are linear in the 1–1000 ng.L<sup class="a-plus-plus">−1</sup> concentration range, and the limits of detection range from 0.2 to 2 ng.L<sup class="a-plus-plus">−1</sup>. The intra– and inter–day relative standard deviations for three replicates at levels of 10 and 200 ng.L<sup class="a-plus-plus">−1</sup> are in the range of 5–12% and 10–15%, respectively. The needle–to–needle reproducibility was also found to be in the range of 6–13%. The application of the method to the analysis of various spiked real water samples resulted in recoveries between 84 and 114%.</p> <p class="a-plus-plus"> <span class="a-plus-plus figure category-standard float-no id-figa"> <caption class="a-plus-plus caption language-en lang-en"> <strong class="a-plus-plus caption-number">Graphical abstract</strong> <em class="a-plus-plus caption-content"> <div class="a-plus-plus simple-para">A comparison of extraction efficiency between 3D–MOF and 2D–POM, in which 3D–MOF is superior to isolate organic pollutants, due to possession of more 4,4′–bpy ligands and interaction sites</div> </em> </caption> <span class="a-plus-plus media-object id-m-o1"> <img alt="" src="https://static-content.springer.com/image/MediaObjects/604_2018_3070_Figa_HTML.png" class="a-plus-plus"/> </span> </span> </p>
chemistry, analytical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?