Abstract:Objective: To compare the effects of different imaging methods on radio-opacity. Digital imaging and traditional film imaging were used to determine the radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials. Methods: Fourteen dental composite resins commonly used in clinic were prepared for disc samples with thickness of 1 mm and diameter of 15 mm respectively. The aluminum step wedge was used as the reference and the disc samples were irradiated with X-rays by the traditional film imaging, phosphor imaging plate and charge-coupled device(CCD) intra-oral X-ray sensor respectively. Exposure was set at 65 kV and 7 mA, with 300 mm focus to film distance and the exposure time was 0.25 s. After developing and fixing the film, the optical density of the image of the sample and that of each step of the aluminum step wedge were measured using the densitometer. The digital image file was exported to grey scale analysis software of Adobe Photoshop® to measure the average grey value in the sample image and aluminum step wedge image. The curves were drawn corresponding to the optical density/gray value of each step of the aluminum step wedge and its thickness, and the equivalent thickness of the aluminum plate was calculated according to the optical density/gray value of the actual measured thickness of the sample, so as to evaluate the radio-opacity of dental composite resin material. Results: For the same sample, the aluminum equivalent measured by traditional film imaging and two other digital imagings had significant differences among the 14 composite resins (P < 0.05), and the aluminum equivalent measured by the two digital imagings were greater than that of the traditional film. Moreover the aluminum equivalent measured by the two digital imagings was also different, and the aluminum equivalent measured by the CCD intra-oral X-ray sensor in most composite resins was larger than that measured by phosphor imaging plate. The same sample was photographed with the same imaging method, and the aluminum equivalent was different after three exposures. The standard deviation of aluminum equivalent measured by phosphor imaging plate was the largest, while that measured by CCD intra-oral X-ray sensor was the smallest. Among the 14 dental composite resin materials, the aluminum equivalent of Tetric N-Ceram and Te-Econom Plus measured by traditional film imaging and phosphor imaging plate was significantly higher than other composite resins. Conclusion: Based on clinical significance, three kinds of sensors designed to measure the radio-opacity of dental composite resin, the value of aluminum equivalent will change according to different types of sensors. The aluminum equivalent measured by CCD intra-oral X-ray sensor was higher than that measured by phosphor imaging plate, and the aluminum equivalent measured by phosphor imaging plate was higher than that measured by traditional film imaging. Moreover, even though the same sensor was used, the aluminum equivalent measured by multiple exposures was different. The standard deviation of the aluminum equivalent measured by phosphor imaging plate was greater than that measured by traditional film imaging and CCD intra-oral X-ray sensor. The three sensors in this study could be used for evaluating the radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials. But no matter what kind of sensor was used to measure the radio-opacity of dental composite resin, it complied to ISO 4049: 2019 standard, the materials were suitable for clinical use.

A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material Composition

Radiopacity of Posterior Restorative Materials: A Comparative In Vitro Study

A comparison of the radiopacities of CAD-CAM restoratives: Effect of thickness

Influence of Restoration Thickness and Resin Cement on Translucency and Color of Different Types of Monolithic Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Ceramic

The radiopacity of single‐shade composite resins: A comparative evaluation

Effect of the Composition of CAD/CAM Composite Blocks on Mechanical Properties

Exploring the optical behavior and relative translucency parameter of CAD-CAM resin-based composites, polymer-infiltrated ceramic network, and feldspar porcelain

Comparison of conventional and digital radiography systems with regard to radiopacity of root canal filling materials

[Comparative study on radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials'determination using film imaging and digital imaging]

Quantitative Analysis of Color Accuracy and Bias in 4 Dental CAD-CAM Monolithic Restorative Materials with Different Thicknesses: an in Vitro Study.

Effects of thickness and polishing treatment on the translucency and opalescence of six dental CAD-CAM monolithic restorative materials: an in vitro study

Evaluation of Physical–Chemical Properties of Contemporary CAD/CAM Materials with Chromatic Transition "Multicolor"

The Surface Roughness of Contemporary Indirect CAD/CAM Restorative Materials That Are Glazed and Chair-Side-Finished/Polished

Physico-mechanical properties and bacterial adhesion of resin composite CAD/CAM blocks: An in-vitro study

Assessing the Aesthetic Performance of CAD/CAM Provisional Restorative Materials: A Spectrophotometric Analysis

Comparative Analysis of the Color Stability of Machined Denture Base Materials: An In-Vitro Approach

Evaluation of artifacts produced by conventional dental materials in standard and high-resolution CBCT imaging

In vitro Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity of Chairside CAD/CAM Block Materials for Fabricating Dental Restorations

Fracture resistance and failure mode of three esthetic CAD-CAM post and core restorations

Evaluation and Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Lithium Disilicate-Based CAD/CAM Blocks

Comparative analysis of various temporary computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing polymethyl methacrylate crown materials based on color stability, flexural strength, and surface roughness: An in vitro study