Effective coping strategies for stressed frontline employees in service occupations: outcomes and drivers

Veronika L. Selzer,Jan H. Schumann,Marion Büttgen,Zelal Ates,Marcin Komor,Julian Volz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1548613
2018-11-22
Abstract:Despite extensive research on the negative outcomes of role ambiguity in boundary-spanning positions, insight into how to prevent frontline employees from experiencing role ambiguity is sparse. This study addresses questions as to how the problem-focused coping strategies used by frontline employees can effectively reduce perceived role ambiguity. The gathered evidence indicates that only <i>action coping</i> is effective, whereas <i>instrumental support seeking</i> in fact enhances perceived role ambiguity. An examination of intrinsic and extrinsic coping resources as drivers of coping has revealed that <i>conscientiousness</i> and <i>supervisor support</i> are helpful coping resources. Contrastively, <i>neuroticism</i> drives insufficient coping and inhibits the effective use of coping resources. We find that managers of service firms should provide training to ensure effective supervisor support; also, in recruitment procedures they should consider potential employees’ personality traits, to reduce and prevent role ambiguity experienced by frontline employees.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?