To reflect or to detach after work? Relating interpersonal challenge and hindrance stressors to engagement and burnout.

Jiajin Tong,Christiane Spitzmueller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000317

2024-01-22

International Journal of Stress Management

Abstract:We remind people of the complex impact of interpersonal stressors with different valences by exploring how employees respond to different interpersonal stressors, and elucidate the role of two popular copings used during off-the-job recovery time, namely, positive work reflection and psychological detachment. Borrowed from the task-related challenge-hindrance stressors classification, we similarly reconstruct interpersonal stressors, examining interpersonal challenge (e.g., emotional demands) and hindrance stressors (e.g., interpersonal conflict). Guided by affective events theory, we build a moderated mediation model exploring the impact of interpersonal challenge and hindrance stressors on work engagement and job burnout via positive and negative affect, depending on individual coping behaviors. Health care professionals (N = 169) completed four waves of survey-based data collection. Using structural equation modeling, we found that positive work reflection buffered the impact of interpersonal challenge stressors (i.e., emotional demands) on reduced work engagement via reduced positive affect. However, psychological detachment strengthened the impact of interpersonal hindrance stressors (i.e., interpersonal conflict) on deteriorated burnout via increased negative affect. In other words, coping mechanisms that work for task stressors may not be effective in addressing interpersonal stressors. We recommend that employees carefully weigh the potential costs and benefits of adopting recovery strategies when dealing with different interpersonal stressors. We also recommend future researchers assess potentially positive elements of interpersonal challenges carefully. Theoretical implications and future research directions are discussed.

psychology, applied