Abstract:Objective:To provide a clinical evidence-based medicine by comparing the efficacy of all-inside versus inside-out suture techniques in arthroscopic meniscal injury repair surgery.Methods:Five English and Chinese databases were searched for controlled studies about arthroscopic meniscus all-inside versus inside-out suture, including PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpt Medica Database(EMBASE), China Knowledge Network Infrastructure, and Wanfang. The search was conducted from the establishment of the database to May 2020, and the results were limited to English and Chinese literature. According to the defined criteria, patients who first underwent arthroscopic meniscus suture and had no underlying disease or other joint disease were screened for inclusion. After data extraction, five indicators were pooled including excellent healed rate, complications, operative time, Lyshlom score, and Tegner score. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the Cochrane System Evaluation Manual and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The analysis of dichotomous and continuous variables was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.Results:Ten studies with a total of 631 patients (340 in the all-inside suture group and 291 in the inside-out suture group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in rate of meniscal excellent healed. The result of all-inside suture was similar to inside-out suture [the randomized control trial (RCT) group: the risk ratio (RR)=1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.79, 1.31), P=0.88; non-RCT group: RR=1.00, 95% CI (0.92, 1.09), P=0.99]. The all-inside suture technique did not reduce the postoperative complication rate, and there was no statistically significant difference between the all-inside suture method and the inside-out suture method [RCT group: RR=0.65, 95% CI (0.22, 1.92), P=0.43; non-RCT group: RR=0.50, 95% CI (0.25, 1.97), P=0.05]. The mean operative time of patients in the all-inside suture group was shorter than the Inside-out suture group, with a statistically significant difference of 16 min in RCT group and 46 min in non-RCT group [RCT group: mean difference (MD)=-16.31, 95% CI (-30.56, -2.07), P=0.02; non-RCT group: MD=-46.60, 95% CI (-60.79, -32.41), P<0.001]. The effect of all-inside and inside-out suture on the knee function of patients was similar, and there were no statistically significant difference in both group for postoperative Lyshlom score [RCT group: MD=6.24, 95% CI (-11.39, 23.86), P=0.49; non-RCT group: MD=1.15, 95% CI (-0.40, 2.69), P=0.15] and Tegner score [MD=0.00 95% CI (-0.20, 0.21), P=0.97].Conclusions:Compared with the inside-out suture technique, the arthroscopic all-inside suture has no advantage in terms of meniscal excellent healed rate, complication rate or knee function. However, all-inside suture can shorten the mean operation time. The clinician should be thoughtful in choosing the all-inside suture as the procedure is more costly and the outcomes are comparable to inside-out suture.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair in Young Patients: Comparison of All-Inside and Inside-Out Suture Techniques

Meta-analysis on efficacy of all-inside versus inside-out suture for arthroscopic meniscal repair

The Effect and Long-term Prognosis of Different Suturing Methods for Meniscus Repair Under Knee Arthroscopy

Failure and complication rates following meniscal all‐inside and inside‐out repairs: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Inside-Out Approach to Meniscus Repair: Still the Gold Standard?

All-Inside and Inside-Out Repair Techniques for Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears Both Result in Improved Patient Outcomes and a Broad Range of Failure Rates: A Systematic Review

Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Versus Observation in Older Patients With Meniscus Root Tears

Greater rate of return to play and re-injury following all-inside meniscal repair compared to the inside-out technique: a systematic review

Editorial Commentary: Various Meniscal Repair Techniques Show Similar Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes, and Horizontal Suture Orientation Is Best Avoided

Inside-Out Repair of the Meniscus in Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures

Clinical results of arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair -

Arthroscopic meniscal repair: a comparative study between three different surgical techniques

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes Following Meniscus Repair in Patients 40 Years and Older

Clininal Outcome of Combined Inside-Out and Outside-in Technique in Miniscus Repair

Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Technique for Repairing Rotator Cuff Tears: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Repair of meniscal transverse injury with arthroscopic inside-Out suture

Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes of meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of suture and meniscus fixation device

Paper 32: All-inside meniscus repair leads to higher rate of failure compared to inside-out meniscus repair in elite athletes

Effects of arthroscopic outside-in sutures versus all-inside sutures in the treatment of lateral disc meniscus injury of the knee joint under arthroscopy

[A mid-term clinical follow-up study on repair of the meniscus tears by a modified arthroscopic outside-in puncture suture technique].

Meniscal Radial Tears Repaired with All-Inside and Inside-Out Techniques Result in Improved Clinical Outcome Scores; However, More Complications are Reported After Inside-Out Repair: A Systematic Review