Meta-analysis on efficacy of all-inside versus inside-out suture for arthroscopic meniscal repair
田海泉,张鹏,李晓东,杨惠强,祁志强,李璐,王子江
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.04.009
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To provide a clinical evidence-based medicine by comparing the efficacy of all-inside versus inside-out suture techniques in arthroscopic meniscal injury repair surgery.Methods:Five English and Chinese databases were searched for controlled studies about arthroscopic meniscus all-inside versus inside-out suture, including PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpt Medica Database(EMBASE), China Knowledge Network Infrastructure, and Wanfang. The search was conducted from the establishment of the database to May 2020, and the results were limited to English and Chinese literature. According to the defined criteria, patients who first underwent arthroscopic meniscus suture and had no underlying disease or other joint disease were screened for inclusion. After data extraction, five indicators were pooled including excellent healed rate, complications, operative time, Lyshlom score, and Tegner score. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the Cochrane System Evaluation Manual and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The analysis of dichotomous and continuous variables was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.Results:Ten studies with a total of 631 patients (340 in the all-inside suture group and 291 in the inside-out suture group) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in rate of meniscal excellent healed. The result of all-inside suture was similar to inside-out suture [the randomized control trial (RCT) group: the risk ratio (RR)=1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.79, 1.31), P=0.88; non-RCT group: RR=1.00, 95% CI (0.92, 1.09), P=0.99]. The all-inside suture technique did not reduce the postoperative complication rate, and there was no statistically significant difference between the all-inside suture method and the inside-out suture method [RCT group: RR=0.65, 95% CI (0.22, 1.92), P=0.43; non-RCT group: RR=0.50, 95% CI (0.25, 1.97), P=0.05]. The mean operative time of patients in the all-inside suture group was shorter than the Inside-out suture group, with a statistically significant difference of 16 min in RCT group and 46 min in non-RCT group [RCT group: mean difference (MD)=-16.31, 95% CI (-30.56, -2.07), P=0.02; non-RCT group: MD=-46.60, 95% CI (-60.79, -32.41), P<0.001]. The effect of all-inside and inside-out suture on the knee function of patients was similar, and there were no statistically significant difference in both group for postoperative Lyshlom score [RCT group: MD=6.24, 95% CI (-11.39, 23.86), P=0.49; non-RCT group: MD=1.15, 95% CI (-0.40, 2.69), P=0.15] and Tegner score [MD=0.00 95% CI (-0.20, 0.21), P=0.97].Conclusions:Compared with the inside-out suture technique, the arthroscopic all-inside suture has no advantage in terms of meniscal excellent healed rate, complication rate or knee function. However, all-inside suture can shorten the mean operation time. The clinician should be thoughtful in choosing the all-inside suture as the procedure is more costly and the outcomes are comparable to inside-out suture.