Abstract:BackgroundWith the development of computational literacy, there has been a surge in both research and practice application of text-based and block-based modalities within the field of computer programming education. Despite this trend, little work has actually examined how learners engaging in programming process when utilizing these two major programming modalities, especially in the context of secondary education settings.ObjectivesTo further compare programming effects between and within text-based and block-based modalities, this research conducted a quasi-experimental research in China's secondary school.MethodsAn online programming platform, Code4all, was developed to allow learners to program in text-based and block-based modalities. This research collected multimodal data sources, including programming platform data, process data, and performance data. This research further utilized multiple learning analytics approaches (i.e., clustering analysis, click stream analysis, lag-sequential analysis and statistics) to compare learners' programming features, behavioural patterns and knowledge gains under two modalities.Results and ConclusionsThe results indicated that learners in text-based modality tended to write longer lines of code, encountered more syntactical errors, and took longer to attempt debugging. In contrast, learners in block-based modality spent more time operating blocks and attempt debugging, achieving better programming knowledge performances compared to their counterparts. Further analysis of five clusters from the two modalities revealed discrepancies in programming behavioural patterns.ImplicationsThree major pedagogical implications were proposed based on empirical research results. Furthermore, this research contributed to the learning analytics literature by integrating process-oriented and summative analysis to reveal learners' programming learning quality. What is currently known about the subject matterThe implications of study findings for practitionersProgramming has the potential to improve learners' higher-order thinking skills.Block-based and text-based modalities are two major instructional methods.There has been a growing interest to understand how learning occurs in two modes.Most previous work has evaluated two modalities based on learners' knowledge, skills, and attitudes.What this paper addsCode4all allows learners to programming in text-based and block-based modalities.Quasi-experimental research was conducted to examine block-based and text-based programming modalities.Multimodal learning analytics were used to compare programming under two modalities.Learners' programming features, behaviouralbehavioral patterns, and knowledge gains were identified under two modalities.Instructors should integrate text-based and block-based modalities into programming courses.Process-oriented assessment should be integrated with summative assessment.Adaptive, timely scaffoldings should be provided with the external support (this should be marked like above two points).Instructors should integrate text-based and block-based modalities into programming courses.Process-oriented assessment should be integrated with summative assessment.Adaptive, timely scaffoldings should be provided with the external support (this should be marked like above two points).

Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Programming Education: Theories and Exemplars of Use

What Do We Think We Think We Are Doing?: Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Programming.

Getting by with Help from My Friends: Group Study in Introductory Programming Understood As Socially Shared Regulation

Using Multimodal Learning Analytics to Understand Effects of Block-Based and Text-Based Modalities on Computer Programming

Can metacognition predict your success in solving problems? An exploratory case study in programming

Programming Self-Efficacy in Higher Education Research: A Systematic Literature Review

Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning

Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion

A Closer Look at Metacognitive Scaffolding: Solving Test Cases Before Programming

Teaching Ethics in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review of ACM Computer Science Education Publications

How Creatively Are We Teaching and Assessing Creativity in Computing Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Recommendations for Improving End-User Programming Education: A Case Study with Undergraduate Chemistry Students

Programming education and learner motivation in the age of generative AI: student and educator perspectives

Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?

Personalization, Cognition, and Gamification-based Programming Language Learning: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Literature Review

Educating Programmers: A Reflection on Barriers to Deliberate Practice

Coding and Computational Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Review of Educational Outcomes

A Scoping Review of Studies on Computational Thinking in K–12 Mathematics Classrooms

A review of introductory programming research 2003-2017.

A Review of Introductory Programming Research 2003–2017

The role of metacognitive skills in solving object-oriented programming problems: a case study