Categorizing Supply Chain Risks: Review, Integrated Typology and Future Research

Michalis Louis,Mark Pagell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_20
2018-12-19
Abstract:NowadaysSupply chain, supply chains operate in a dynamic environment where a potential unwanted event that does not constitute a risk today may be a severe risk tomorrow. Recent events indicate that supply chainSupply chain operations of a focal firm may be harmed, when risks that were not successfully identified, materialize. This underlines the importance of supply chain risk identificationSupply Chain Risk Identification process in supply chain risk managementSupply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) (SCRM), which can affect a firm’s long-term survival. Firms that are aware of the types of risks that may adversely affect their supply chainSupply chain operations can improve the management of these risks. Despite the merit of previous studies on supply chain risk identificationSupply Chain Risk Identification, current literature is incomplete to offer an inclusive categorization of supply chainSupply chain risks. This hinders the efforts of firms to develop meaningful risk categorizations, and subsequently their overall supply chain riskSupply chain risk management effort. This chapter aims to alleviate this problem. First, it reviews the various typologies proposed in the SCRM literature since 2000 using the systematic network analysis method. By explaining how the categorization of supply chainSupply chain risks has evolved, this chapter provides valuable insights, both to researchers and practitioners, regarding the historical development of the field. A key conclusion from this review is that none of the existing typologies is complete, though most overlap. Therefore, the second contribution of the chapter is to build on what is already known to offer a new typology of supply chainSupply chain risks that is both inclusive and parsimonious. Finally, the chapter provides recommendations for future research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?