REFS-A Risk Evaluation Framework on Supply Chain

István Mihálcz,Zsolt T. Kosztyán

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12060841

IF: 2.4

2024-03-14

Mathematics

Abstract:Large, powerful corporations were formerly solely and exclusively responsible for supplies, manufacturing, and distribution; however, the supply chain has undergone significant transformations over the last half-century. Almost all supply chain processes are currently outsourced, owing to the initiatives of cutting-edge, contemporary businesses. According to a compilation of studies, analysts, and news sources, the level of risk associated with modern supply chains is considerably higher than the majority of supply chain managers believe. Supply chain vulnerabilities continue to pose a substantial obstacle for a great number of organizations. Neglecting to adequately address these risks—encompassing natural disasters, cyber assaults, acts of terrorism, the credit crisis, pandemic scenarios, and war—could result in substantial reductions in metrics such as profitability, productivity, revenue, and competitive advantage. Unresolved concerns persist with respect to the risk assessment of the supply chain. The purpose of this article is to propose a framework for risk evaluation that can be efficiently applied to the evaluation of hazards within the supply chain. This research study significantly enhances the existing knowledge base by offering supply chain managers a pragmatic tool to evaluate their processes, regardless of the mathematical foundations or the variety of variables utilized in risk assessment. The outcomes of multiple aggregation methods are compared using a case study from an automotive EMS production; the conclusions are validated by risk and FMEA specialists from the same factory.

mathematics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily focuses on addressing the issue of risk assessment in supply chain management. Specifically, the authors note that modern supply chains face higher levels of risk due to outsourcing, globalization, and other factors. These risks include natural disasters, cyber-attacks, terrorist activities, financial crises, pandemic scenarios, and wars. Supply chain managers often underestimate the potential negative impacts of these risks, such as declines in profitability, productivity, revenue, and competitive advantage.

To address these issues, the paper proposes a risk assessment framework called REFS (Risk Evaluation Framework on Supply Chain). This framework aims to provide a practical tool to help supply chain managers better assess the risks in their processes. Compared to the traditional FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) method, the REFS framework considers more risk factors and employs different aggregation methods to comprehensively evaluate multiple risk indicators.

The main contributions of the paper include:
1. **Literature Review**: A comprehensive review of existing supply chain risk management techniques and methods, highlighting the widespread application and limitations of FMEA in supply chain risk assessment.
2. **Proposing a New Risk Assessment Framework**: Development of an improved FMEA method incorporating fuzzy logic, called TREF (not fully explained), which can handle more than three risk factors.
3. **Selection of Aggregation Functions**: Exploration of different types of aggregation functions, such as geometric mean, median, arithmetic mean, Euclidean distance, etc., and discussion of their applicability and limitations in risk assessment.
4. **Case Study**: Validation of the proposed framework's effectiveness through a case study of an automotive electronics manufacturing service company. The study compares the results of various risk assessment methods and uses the TOPSIS algorithm for scoring.

In summary, this paper aims to provide a more comprehensive and effective assessment tool for supply chain risk management, helping organizations better identify and manage various risks in their supply chains.