Abstract:Purpose: To present an excerpt from author’s own study conducted among HR professionals, managers and directors in December 2022 in Poland as part of the research project 'HR Compliance in HR Risk Management'. The aim of the article is to characterise whistleblowing as a tool of the HR Compliance Management System and to identify differences in the evaluation of the process of reporting wrongdoing and undesirable behaviour in organisations depending on the job position of the respondents, the size of employment in the company, the form of ownership and the industry. Design/methodology/approach: A proprietary survey questionnaire was developed. The study was carried out using a diagnostic survey method. A computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) and a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) were used. Statistical methods were used to analyse the survey results, including chi-square test with Yates’ correction, Kruskal-Wallis test. Findings: Whistleblowing is an instrument for detecting wrongdoing in organisations, being one of the three pillars of HR Compliance and an important tool of the Compliance Management System. Differences in the evaluation of the various elements of the whistleblowing system have been diagnosed. One-third of the respondents do not have a clear opinion on the evaluation of a well-established whistleblowing system. In medium-sized companies, respondents' rating is higher than in other organisations in terms of evaluating internal channels for whistleblowing, as well as protecting whistleblowers from retaliation. The HR department is the entity empowered to receive and coordinate the handling of whistleblowing reports in the workplace in public organisations, which stand out with the highest average rating of providing anonymity to the whistleblower and granting protection to the whistleblower against potential retaliation. Differences in rating by job position relate to issues of organisational culture, employee confidence in the proper functioning of the company's whistleblowing system, the scope of reportable wrongdoing within the company, the preparation and provision of internal channels for whistleblowing. On average, professionals rate the whistleblowing system in organisations lower. Research limitations/implications: The research sample was 205 units. The survey was not randomised and therefore the results developed are not representative and do not allow generalisation and drawing conclusions about the phenomenon on a national scale. Practical implications: The results obtained from the research may be useful for business owners, managers, human resources and compliance professionals who are responsible in organisations for implementing systemic whistleblowing solutions in the workplace. Social implications: Building awareness of whistleblowing and its key role in the HR Compliance management system in companies. Originality/value: The article is of cognitive value for the development of management and quality science in the area of human resource management and organisational risk management. It contributes to the development of knowledge on whistleblowing in companies from a management perspective. Keywords: whistleblowing, whistleblower, compliance risk, HR Compliance, personnel risk, compliance management system. Category of the paper: Research paper.

Country notes: Tax and Whistle-Blower Protection: Part of a Commitment to Tackling Tax Misconduct in Australia

Encouraging and Rewarding the Whistleblower in Research Misconduct Cases

Taking it outside: A study of legal contexts and external whistleblowing in China and India

Legal Protection of the Whistleblower. The Possible Consequences of Shifting Public Administrative Duties to the Individuals

Whistleblowing as an anti-corruption strategy in health and pharmaceutical organizations in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Whistleblower protection in the digital age -- why 'anonymous' is not enough. From technology to a wider view of governance

The effect of the proposed national data protection regime on the health sector in Australia

On the Legal System of Tax Voluntary Disclosure Based on Tax Compliance

Detect and Deter or Catch and Release: Are Financial Penalties an Effective Way to Penalise Deliberate Tax Evaders?

Australian workplace health and safety regulatory approaches to prosecution: Hegemonising compliance

Tax Administration in China: is It Rule Without Law?

Factors influencing internal whistleblowing. A systematic review of the literature

Whistleblowing as a tool for HR compliance management system – survey report

Fringe Benefit Taxes: The Changes, and Strategies for Handling it

Antecedents of company secretaries’ behaviour and their relationship and effect on intended whistleblowing

Missing (in) Action: Where Are the Australian Data Breach Class Actions?

New Developments in Dispute Resolution in International Tax

Whistleblowing Decisions by Police Officers

REGULATION OF AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND NATIONAL SECURITY: LESSONS FROM THREE CASE STUDIES

The Criminal Law, the Intelligence and Security Act and the Protective Security Requirements

Whistleblowing Allegations, Audit Fees, and Internal Control Deficiencies*