Abstract:Purpose: To present an excerpt from author’s own study conducted among HR professionals, managers and directors in December 2022 in Poland as part of the research project 'HR Compliance in HR Risk Management'. The aim of the article is to characterise whistleblowing as a tool of the HR Compliance Management System and to identify differences in the evaluation of the process of reporting wrongdoing and undesirable behaviour in organisations depending on the job position of the respondents, the size of employment in the company, the form of ownership and the industry. Design/methodology/approach: A proprietary survey questionnaire was developed. The study was carried out using a diagnostic survey method. A computer-assisted web interview (CAWI) and a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) were used. Statistical methods were used to analyse the survey results, including chi-square test with Yates’ correction, Kruskal-Wallis test. Findings: Whistleblowing is an instrument for detecting wrongdoing in organisations, being one of the three pillars of HR Compliance and an important tool of the Compliance Management System. Differences in the evaluation of the various elements of the whistleblowing system have been diagnosed. One-third of the respondents do not have a clear opinion on the evaluation of a well-established whistleblowing system. In medium-sized companies, respondents' rating is higher than in other organisations in terms of evaluating internal channels for whistleblowing, as well as protecting whistleblowers from retaliation. The HR department is the entity empowered to receive and coordinate the handling of whistleblowing reports in the workplace in public organisations, which stand out with the highest average rating of providing anonymity to the whistleblower and granting protection to the whistleblower against potential retaliation. Differences in rating by job position relate to issues of organisational culture, employee confidence in the proper functioning of the company's whistleblowing system, the scope of reportable wrongdoing within the company, the preparation and provision of internal channels for whistleblowing. On average, professionals rate the whistleblowing system in organisations lower. Research limitations/implications: The research sample was 205 units. The survey was not randomised and therefore the results developed are not representative and do not allow generalisation and drawing conclusions about the phenomenon on a national scale. Practical implications: The results obtained from the research may be useful for business owners, managers, human resources and compliance professionals who are responsible in organisations for implementing systemic whistleblowing solutions in the workplace. Social implications: Building awareness of whistleblowing and its key role in the HR Compliance management system in companies. Originality/value: The article is of cognitive value for the development of management and quality science in the area of human resource management and organisational risk management. It contributes to the development of knowledge on whistleblowing in companies from a management perspective. Keywords: whistleblowing, whistleblower, compliance risk, HR Compliance, personnel risk, compliance management system. Category of the paper: Research paper.

Legal Protection of the Whistleblower. The Possible Consequences of Shifting Public Administrative Duties to the Individuals

Whistleblower protection in the digital age -- why 'anonymous' is not enough. From technology to a wider view of governance

Whistleblowing as a tool for HR compliance management system – survey report

Factors influencing internal whistleblowing. A systematic review of the literature

Taking it outside: A study of legal contexts and external whistleblowing in China and India

Whistleblowing Intentions of Lower-Level Employees: the Effect of Reporting Channel, Bystanders, and Wrongdoer Power Status

Protection of Individuals in the light of EU Regulation 2016/679 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of such Data

Internal Investigations, Whistleblowing and External Monitoring

Radca prawny w postępowaniach prowadzonych przez „nowy” OLAF i EPPO

Antecedents of company secretaries’ behaviour and their relationship and effect on intended whistleblowing

Whistleblowing as an anti-corruption strategy in health and pharmaceutical organizations in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

THE ROLE OF ETHICAL LEADERSHIP AND WHISTLEBLOWING INTENTIONS: MEDIATING APPARATUS OF MORAL IDENTITY

Health professionals' experiences of whistleblowing in maternal and newborn healthcare settings: A scoping review and thematic analysis

Whistleblowing Decisions by Police Officers

‘Whistleblowing Triangle’: Framework and Empirical Evidence

Analyzing the effect of financial reward, personal cost and reporting channel on whistleblowing intentions utilizing an experimental study

Anticorruption, Privacy, and (Gay) Family – The CJEU Rules on Financial Disclosure of Public Officials (C-184/20)

The Moderating Influence of Behavioral Integrity on the Effect of Reporting Channel Administration and Bystander Awareness on Whistleblowing Intentions

Analysis of the Ethical Justice of the Behavior Motivation of the Whistleblowers

Silencing the Risk, Not the Whistle: A Semi-automated Text Sanitization Tool for Mitigating the Risk of Whistleblower Re-Identification

Whistleblowing by auditors: the role of professional commitment and independence commitment