Abstract:IntroductionRecently, the need for higher education has become a considerably controversial topic. Scholars of all fields question whether academia and practice can be integrated seamlessly, and whether such integration is practicable in the workplace. This study aims at elucidating how the characteristics and education backgrounds of fund managers correlate with the performance of the funds they manage. According to Chevalier and Ellison (1999a), the perfonnance of funds operated by managers who attain an MBA from one of the top 30 schools listed by Business Week is superior to those operated by fund managers who receive their education at other schools. The findings of that study also show that fund perfonnance is unassociated with fund managers who have postgraduate degrees.Numerous scholars contend that gender influences work perfonnance, claiming that men are more willing to take risks, and they are more confident in strategy fonnulation. Previous studies indicate that a glass ceiling is common, even in businesses in Chinese communities. However, Atkinson, Baird, and Frye (2003) report that gender does not have a significant influence on fund performance.Heilman et al. (1989) and Oakley (2000) explore gender as a variable of fund manager characteristics and show that men outperform women in terms of work ability; consequently, investors are more willing to invest in funds that are managed by men. However, these claims are regarded as general stereotypes.In accordance with the research background and motivations, this study adopts an empirical analysis approach to determine the association between the education background of fund managers in Taiwan and the performance of the funds they operate, thereby providing an objective method for identifying the association between fund manager characteristics and fund performance. Investors can use the findings of This study as a reference when choosing investment funds.This paper is structured into 5 chapters. Chapter I presents the introduction, research motivations, and objectives, and Chapter II presents the findings of previous literatme in the fonn of a literature review. The research design is introduced in Chapter III, followed by a discussion regarding the various research variables and models. In, Chapter IV, the empirical results are discussed and the performance of fund managers with varying characteristics is compared. Finally, Chapter V offers the conclusion of this study and lists the recoimnendations proposed by the researchers.Literature ReviewFund Manager Characteristics and Fund PerformanceLin (2007) examines the performance of open-ended general equity funds in Taiwan for the 2006 financial year by using independent-sample t tests as well product-moment correlation and multiple regression analyses to determine the correlations among fund manager characteristics (e.g., gender, education, and years of service), operating characteristics (e.g., cash reserve ratio and structure of shareholding ratio), and fund performance. The findings of that study show that the funds managed by men significantly outperform those operated by women.Ke (2007) examines the performance of open-ended equity funds in Taiwan between 2000 and 2007 by using a Carhart Four-Factor Model and t tests to determine the influences of fund manager characteristics (e.g., gender, location of education, professional qualifications, and educational attainment) on their fund performance and career advancement. The findings of that study show that the stock-picking ability of female fund managers is superior to that of their male counterparts.Golee (1996) examines the mutual funds recorded in the Mutual Fund Sourcebook Volume published by Momingstar Inc. between 1988 and 1990. The researcher uses a three-stage least squares approach to determine the influences that fund manager traits have on fund performance, risk, and expense. In addition to fund manager characteristics (e. …

Mutual Fund Manager Educational Background and Activeness

Managerial Activeness and Mutual Fund Performance

Do Active Funds Perform Better in Down Markets? New Evidence from Cross-Sectional Study

Does Active Management Improve Mutual Fund's Performance?

Why do investors buy shares of actively managed equity mutual funds? Considering the Correct Reference Portfolio from an Uninformed Investor's Perspective 1, 2

Performance of Equity Mutual Fund and Educational Credentials of Fund Manager

Interviews with Institutional Investors: The How and Why of Active Investing

In Search for Managerial Skills Beyond Common Performance Measures

The Association between Education Background and Fund Performance of Fund Managers

Mutual Fund Performance Attribution: 1994-2005

Active Fundamental Performance

On the Managerial Skills of Mutual Fund Managers (Manipulation-Proof Performance Measure)

Factors Influencing Mutual Fund Performance: Manager Skill, Fees, Fund Size, and Market Conditions

An Examination of the Performance of the Trades and Stock Holdings of Fund Managers: Further Evidence

The role of passive effects in the relationship between active management and short-term performance: Evidence from mutual fund portfolio holdings

Active Fund Management when ESG Matters: An Equilibrium Perspective

Beta Active Hedge Fund Management

V-Shaped Disposition: Mutual Fund Trading Behavior and Price Effects

Empirical study on mutual fund objective classification

Running a mutual fund: Performance and trading behavior of runner managers

Holding-Based Evaluation upon Actively Managed Stock Mutual Funds in China