Abstract:Performance evaluation of mutual funds using factor pricing models is usually distorted by the existence of a volatility anomaly and correlated residuals. By augmenting the Fama-French five-factor model with an active peer benchmark, we eliminate the measurement errors caused by these distortions. We find that the APB-augmented fivefactor model can select mutual fund portfolios with superior out of sample alphas. However, the excess portfolio returns are volatile and subject to crash risk. A risk management strategy which uses the past volatility of the mutual fund portfolio returns to scale the investment positions can help reduce the volatility of the portfolio returns and avoid extreme losses. Previous studies on stock and currency portfolios find that such a risk management technique also increases the Sharpe ratio of the portfolios. However, we find that the net impact of the risk management on the Sharpe ratio of mutual fund portfolios depends on the investment style of the mutual funds in the fund portfolios. Similar to the stock and currency portfolios, the Sharpe ratios of the mutual fund portfolios can be increased by the risk management if the portfolios are formed in mutual funds which specialize in large cap stocks. By contrast, risk management reduces the Sharpe ratios of portfolios which include small stocks-focused funds. The reason is that the mutual funds which specialize in small stocks relies more on their abilities to take on more factor risks when the factor returns are high to generate returns. Volatility timing reduces the premium of those funds’ market timing skills. Compared to investors in mutual funds which specialize in value stocks, investors in growth stocks-focused mutual funds can better enhance their market timing skills by the risk management technique. More specifically, after volatility timing, the growth stocksfocused mutual fund investors are able to take on more factor risks when the factor returns are high and gain higher average returns. JEL Classification: C14, C50, G11, G32

V-Shaped Disposition: Mutual Fund Trading Behavior and Price Effects

Overselling Winners and Losers: How Mutual Fund Managers' Trading Behavior Affects Asset Prices

The V-shaped Disposition Effect

Asset Pricing when Traders Sell Extreme Winners and Losers

When Does a Mutual Fund's Trade Reveal Its Skill?

Does Your Fund Manager Trade on the News? Media Coverage, Mutual Fund Trading and Performance

Informed Trading, Liquidity Provision, and Stock Selection by Mutual Funds

An Examination of the Performance of the Trades and Stock Holdings of Fund Managers: Further Evidence

Transaction Costs, Portfolio Characteristics, and Mutual Fund Performance

(Drafted on 2/Jan./2018)

The "Disposition Effect": Behavioral Study of Mutual Fund in China

Change is Good or the Disposition Effect among Mutual Fund Managers

Riding the Post Earnings Announcement Drift: Evidence from Mutual Funds

Do Mutual Funds Gamble? Evidence from the Skewness Adjusting Behavior of Fund Managers

An Empirical Study on the Momentum and Contrarian Strategies of Mutual Funds

Corporate managers, price noise and the investment factor

The Impact of Mutual Fund Investment Trading on Stock Prices: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market

Do Mutual Funds Profit from the Accruals Anomaly?

Trading Duration, Mutual Funds Behavior And Stock Market Shock Based On Acd Model To Mine Mutual Funds Investment Behavior

Managerial Career Concern and Mutual Fund Short-Termism

Volatility-Managed Portfolios of Mutual Funds