Abstract:Guided by "lever‐reconstruction‐balance" hypothesis, we have engineered proximal femoral totally bionic screw (PFTBN) aimed at reconstructing the mechanical role and functionality of the lateral wall. Using the finite element analysis method, PFTBN outperforms proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN) concerning mechanical properties and stability when utilized in the treatment of 31A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures. Objective AO/OTA 31‐A3.3 intertrochanteric fracture is the most unstable type of intertrochanteric fracture, with a high rate of postoperative complications and implant failure. We have designed a new intramedullary fixation, proximal femoral totally bionic nail (PFTBN), for the treatment of A3.3 intertrochanteric fracture. To test its biomechanical performance, we adopted the method of finite element analysis and compared PFTBN with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN, another internal fixation we previously designed for stable intertrochanteric fractures). Methods Mimics, 3‐matic, ANSYS, and other software were used to construct a highly precise and realistic 3D digital model of the human femur. An AO/OTA 31‐A3.3 intertrochanteric fracture of the femur was constructed according to the 2018 classification of AO/OTA, and then assembled with PFNA, PFBN and PFTBN models, respectively. The stress distribution and displacement distribution of the three groups of constructs were tested under three times the body weight load and one‐foot standing configuration. Results In terms of maximum stress and maximum displacement, the PFTBN group outperforms the PFBN group, and the PFBN group, in turn, surpasses the PFNA group. The maximum stress of PFTBN group was 408.5 Mpa, that of PFBN group was 525.4 MPa, and that of PFNA group was 764.3 Mpa. Comparatively, the maximum stress in the PFTBN group was reduced by 46.6% when contrasted with the PFNA group. Moreover, the stress dispersion within the PFTBN group was more evenly distributed than PFNA group. Regarding maximum displacement, the PFTBN group displayed the least displacement at 5.15 mm, followed by the PFBN group at 7.32 mm, and the PFNA group at 7.73 mm. Notably, the maximum displacement of the PFTBN group was 33.4% less than that observed in the PFNA group. Additionally, the relative displacement between the fragment and implant at the tip of pressure screw or helical blade was 0.22 mm in the PFTBN group, 0.34 mm in the PFBN group, and substantially higher 0.51 mm in the PFNA group. Conclusion The "lever‐reconstruction‐balance" theory provides a new perspective for us to understand the mechanical conduction of the proximal femur. Compared with PFNA, in treating A3.3 intertrochanteric fractures PFTBN can better reconstruct the function of lateral wall, restore physiological mechanical conduction, increase postoperative stability, and finally reduce the risk of postoperative cut‐out and implant failure. It might be a better alternative for the treatment of A3.3 intertrochanteric fracture.

A biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques in osteoporotic reverse oblique intertrochanteric femur fracture with fragmented lateral cortex

Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN), Froximal Femoral Anti-rotation Intramedullary Nail and InterTan for Treatment of Reverse Obliquity Intertrochanteric Fractures

The Novel Strategies in the Management of Laparoscopic Pancreatic-Oduodenectomy for Resection Cancer Comparison Surgeons Experience with Showing Outcomes (literature Review)

Biomechanical evaluation of novel intra- and extramedullary assembly fixation for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly

The Comparison of Dynamic Condylar Screw Plate to Proximal Femoral Nail in Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Retrospective Study on 61 Patients

Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for fracture dislocation involving the proximal tibia

[Study on biomechanical stability in simulated femoral neck fracture fixation by two cannulated screws].

The biomechanical study of medial cortex defect on axial stability of proximal humeral fracture fixed with locking plate

Comprehensive biomechanical analysis of three clinically used fixation constructs for posterior malleolar fractures using cadaveric and finite element analysis

Biomechanical comparison of two fixation methods for pediatric femoral neck fractures: an in vitro study using ovis aries lambs

Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur

Biomechanics of internal fixation in Hoffa fractures – A comparison of four different constructs

Posterolateral wall integrity in reverse oblique intertrochanteric fracture fixation: A new perspective in evaluation

Biomechanical comparison of two screw fixations in treatment of tibial plateau fractures ZHANG

Three different interlocking intramedullary nails for unstable reverse oblique inter-trochanteric fractures: a bio-mechanical comparative study

A Novel Internal Fixation Design for the Treatment of AO/OTA‐31A3.3 Intertrochanteric Fractures: Finite Element Analysis

Medial support nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in the treatment of reverse obliquity inter-trochanteric fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesfrogen/Orthopedic Trauma Association 31-A3.1): a finite-element analysis

Experimental and probabilistic analysis of distal femoral periprosthetic fracture: a comparison of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixation. Part A: experimental investigation

Comparison of radiological and functional results in osteoporotic distal femur fractures operated with single plating, lateral incision, and double plating, anterior paramedial incision: A retrospective study

Biomechanical comparison of an intramedullary nail combined with a reconstruction plate combination versus a single intramedullary nail in unstable intertrochanteric fractures with lateral femoral wall fracture: A finite element analysis

Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and plate osteosynthesis for extra-articular proximal tibial fractures with segmental bone defect