Abstract:Background: On December 2017 the Italian Parliament approved law n. 219/2017 "Provisions for informed consent and advance directives" regarding challenging legal and bioethical issues related to healthcare decisions and end-of life choices. The law promotes the person's autonomy as a right and provides for the centrality of the individual in every scenario of health care by mean of three tools: informed consent, shared care planning and advance directives. Few years after the approval of the law, we conducted a survey among physicians working in four health care facilities specific for the care of people suffering from psychiatric disorders, cognitive disorders and dementia located in the North of Italy aiming to investigate their perceived knowledge and training need, attitudes regarding law n. 219/2017 provisions, and practices of implementation of the law. Methods: A semi-structured questionnaire was developed on an online platform. The invitation to participate in the survey was sent by email to the potential participants. Information was collected by means of the online platform (Google Forms) which allows to export data in a spreadsheet (Windows Excel) to perform basic statistical analysis (frequency distributions, bar chart representation). Results: Twenty-five out of sixty physicians participated in the survey. None of the respondents value their knowledge of the law as very good, 10 good, 13 neither poor nor good, 1 poor and 1 very poor. All the respondents want to learn more about the law (21 yes and 4 absolutely yes). The majority of respondents agrees with the content of the law as a whole (3 absolutely agree, 13 agree), and on each provision. The question on the clarity of the concept of capacity in the law received mixed answers and this impacted on the physicians' opinion regarding the legitimacy in principle for our groups of patients to realize shared care planning and write advance directives. Thirteen physicians neither introduced the theme of shared care planning nor arranged for shared care planning and the main reason for this was that no patient was in a clinical situation to require it. When shared care planning is realized, a variability in terms of type and number of meetings, mode of tracking and communication is registered. Conclusions: Our survey results indicate a need for more clarity regarding the interpretation and implementation of the law in the patient groups under study. There are in particular two related areas that deserve further discussion: (1) the question of whether these patient groups are in principle legitimized by the law to realize shared care planning or write advance directives; (2) the notion of capacity required by the law and how this notion can be declined in real-life situations.

The Protection of Health in the Care and Trust Relationship between Doctor and Patient: Competence, Professional Autonomy and Responsibility of the Doctor and Decision-Making Autonomy of the Patient

Towards the implementation of law n. 219/2017 on informed consent and advance directives for patients with psychiatric disorders and dementia. Physicians' knowledge, attitudes and practices in four northern Italian health care facilities

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire investigating the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Healthcare Workers in the Field of Anesthesiology concerning the Italian Law on Advance Healthcare Directives: a Pilot Study

Comparative study on informed consent regulation in health care among Italy, France, United Kingdom, Nordic Countries, Germany, and Spain

Physician-Patient Relationship, Assisted Suicide and the Italian Constitutional Court

On the Legal Attribution and Application of the Doctor-patient Relationship

Italian law n. 24/2017 on physicians’ criminal liability: a reform that does not solve the problems of the psychiatric practice

[Judicial framework for medical decision-making concerning minors]

The legal situation of a physician when parents refuse treatment on behalf of a minor patient

Regulating algorithmic care in the European Union: evolving doctor-patient models through the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI-Act) and the liability directives

[The Medical Expert in the Physician Liability Process: What has Changed Since the Enactment of the Patient Rights Act (PatRG)?]

A Survey of What Healthcare Professionals Consider as Relevant for Decisional Autonomy in Health and Treatment in Nigeria

Role of Law in End-of-Life Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients, Substitute Decision-Makers and Families

Regulating algorithmic care in the European Union: evolving doctor–patient models through the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI-Act) and the liability directives

Artificial intelligence in healthcare: an Italian perspective on ethical and medico-legal implications

[The rights of family members to make medical decisions for their incapacitated relatives]

End-of-life in the operational functioning of public healthcare: ethical and legal issues

["Medical decision making in the tension field between medical possibilities, cost pressure and humanity."]

ONLINE DOCTOR CONSULTATION (TELEMEDICINE) ON COVID-19 PATIENTS IN PERSPECTIVE DOCTOR'S RIGHTS PROTECTION

Legal Protection in Medical Disputes for Doctors in Relation to The Principle of Lex Specialist

Respecting autonomy in young people