A comparative biomechanical analysis of suprapectineal and infrapectineal fixation on acetabular anterior column fracture by finite element modeling

Mehmet YÜCENS,Kadir Bahadır ALEMDAROĞLU,Ahmet ÖZMERİÇ,Serkan İLTAR,Ahmet Özgür YILDIRIM,Nevres H. AYDOĞAN,MEHMET YÜCENS,KADİR BAHADIR ALEMDAROĞLU,AHMET ÖZMERİÇ,SERKAN İLTAR,AHMET ÖZGÜR YILDIRIM,NEVRES HÜRRİYET AYDOĞAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1806-72
2019-01-17
TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Abstract:Background: The aim of this study is to compare the stability and implant stresses of suprapectineal plate with infrapectineal plate in three subconfigurations of the screw types. Methods: The stabilities of different fixation methods were compared by finite-element analysis on six models. Three infrapectineal models and three suprapectineal models each with locked, unlocked or combined screws were employed. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis was performed by using isotropic materials with a load of 2.3 kN applied at standing positions. Motion at the fracture line was measured on four different points that are located at pubic and iliac side of the fracture line. Results: Infrapectineal plate fixation with unlocked screws was found to be the most stable fixation method with 0.006 mm displacement of fragments in all axes at standing positions. Suprapectineal unlocked method was found to be the most unstable in standing positions with maximum distraction values of 0.46 mm vertical shear movement in x-axis, -0.14 mm distraction in y-axis and -0.33 mm lateral shear in z-axis. Conclusions: To our results infrapectineal unlocked plate supplies the most stable fixation with least implant stress in contrary to the suprapectineal unlocked plate, which has the lowest stability and highest implant stresses. Keywords: Acetabular fracture; anterior column; suprapectineal; infrapectineal; fixation; finite element.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?