Abstract:Finding the right balance of quality and quantity can be important, and it is essential that project quality does not drop below the level where important main conclusions are missed or misstated. We use knock-out and over-expression studies as a simplification to test recovery of a known causal gene in RNA-Seq cell line experiments. When single-end RNA-Seq reads are aligned with STAR and quantified with htseq-count, we found potential value in testing the use of the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) implementation of edgeR with robust dispersion estimation more frequently for either single-variate or multi-variate 2-group comparisons (with the possibility of defining criteria less stringent than |fold-change| > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05). When considering a limited number of patient sample comparisons with larger sample size, there might be some decreased variability between methods (except for DESeq1). However, at the same time, the ranking of the gene identified using immunohistochemistry (for ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas) showed as possible shift in performance compared to the cell line comparisons, potentially highlighting utility for standard statistical tests and/or limma-based analysis with larger sample sizes. If this continues to be true in additional studies and comparisons, then that could be consistent with the possibility that it may be important to allocate time for potential methods troubleshooting for genomics projects. Analysis of public data presented in this study does not consider all experimental designs, and presentation of downstream analysis is limited. So, any estimate from this simplification would be an underestimation of the true need for some methods testing for every project. Additionally, this set of independent cell line experiments has a limitation in being able to determine the frequency of missing a highly important gene if the problem is rare (such as 10% or lower). For example, if there was an assumption that only one method can be tested for “initial” analysis, then it is not completely clear to the extent that using edgeR-robust might perform better than DESeq2 in the cell line experiments. Importantly, we do not wish to cause undue concern, and we believe that it should often be possible to define a gene expression differential expression workflow that is suitable for some purposes for many samples. Nevertheless, at the same time, we provide a variety of measures that we believe emphasize the need to critically assess every individual project and maximize confidence in published results.

Comparative analysis of differential gene expression analysis tools for single-cell RNA sequencing data

Differential Expression Analyses for Single-Cell RNA-Seq: Old Questions on New Data

A two-step strategy for detecting differential gene expression in cDNA microarray data

A comprehensive assessment of cell type-specific differential expression methods in bulk data.

A comparison of methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data

Critical Differential Expression Assessment for Individual Bulk RNA-Seq Projects

Bias, robustness and scalability in differential expression analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data

DEsingle for Detecting Three Types of Differential Expression in Single-Cell RNA-seq Data

Degps is a Powerful Tool for Detecting Differential Expression in RNA-sequencing Studies

Evaluation of tools for differential gene expression analysis by RNA-seq on a 48 biological replicate experiment

Comprehensive evaluation of differential expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data

Comprehensive benchmark of differential transcript usage analysis for static and dynamic conditions

Tools for the Analysis of High-Dimensional Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data

Comparative study on differential expression analysis process of RNA-seq data

Influence of single-cell RNA sequencing data integration on the performance of differential gene expression analysis

Single-cell differential expression analysis between conditions within nested settings

A Method Based on Differential Entropy-Like Function for Detecting Differentially Expressed Genes Across Multiple Conditions in RNA-Seq Studies

Theoretical framework for the difference of two negative binomial distributions and its application in comparative analysis of sequencing data

The curses of performing differential expression analysis using single-cell data

Integrative Differential Expression and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis Using Summary Statistics for Scrna-Seq Studies

Power analysis and sample size estimation for RNA-Seq differential expression