Abstract:Humans do not have an accurate representation of probability information in the environment but distort it in a surprisingly stereotyped way (“probability distortion”), as shown in a wide range of judgment and decision-making tasks. Many theories hypothesize that humans automatically compensate for the uncertainty inherent in probability information (“representational uncertainty”) and probability distortion is a consequence of uncertainty compensation. Here we examined whether and how the representational uncertainty of probability is quantified in the human brain and its relevance to probability distortion behavior. Human subjects (13 female and 9 male) kept tracking the relative frequency of one color of dot in a sequence of dot arrays while their brain activity was recorded by MEG. We found converging evidence from both neural entrainment and time-resolved decoding analysis that a mathematically derived measure of representational uncertainty is automatically computed in the brain, despite it is not explicitly required by the task. In particular, the encodings of relative frequency and its representational uncertainty, respectively, occur at latencies of ∼300 and 400 ms. The relative strength of the brain responses to these two quantities correlates with the probability distortion behavior. The automatic and fast encoding of the representational uncertainty provides neural basis for the uncertainty compensation hypothesis of probability distortion. More generally, since representational uncertainty is closely related to confidence estimation, our findings exemplify how confidence might emerge before perceptual judgment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Human perception of probabilities and relative frequencies can be markedly distorted, which is a potential source of disastrous decisions. But the brain is not just ignorant of probability; probability distortions are highly patterned and similar across different tasks. Recent theoretical work suggests that probability distortions arise from the brain's compensation of its own uncertainty in representing probability. Is such representational uncertainty really computed in the brain? To answer this question, we asked human subjects to track an ongoing stimulus sequence of relative frequencies and recorded their brain responses using MEG. Indeed, we found that the neural encoding of representational uncertainty accompanies that of relative frequency, although the former is not explicitly required by the task.

Geometric probability, psychophysics and invariance

The Geometric Invariance in Representing Multiple Objects in Visual Working Memory

Consistency of invariance-based randomization tests

Seeing Things in Random-Dot Videos

Nonparametric Data Analysis on the Space of Perceived Colors

P[A and B] > P[A]P[B] for independent events A,B: erroneous use of probability in a simple visual task

High Dimensional Space Oddity

Image cognition using contour curvature statistics

Geometric Modeling in Probability and Statistics

Ubiquitous log odds: a common representation of probability and frequency distortion in perception, action, and cognition.

Image classification and cognition using contour curvature statistics

Ill-Posed Configurations in Random and Experimental Data Points Collection

Randomness and Apparent Fractality

Visualization of Basic Probability Assignment

Background Independent Quantum Mechanics, Classical Geometric Forms and Geometric Quantum Mechanics-II

Visual Entropy and the Visualization of Uncertainty

Serial reproduction reveals the geometry of visuospatial representations

Automatic and Fast Encoding of Representational Uncertainty Underlies the Distortion of Relative Frequency

Visibility graphs of random scalar fields and spatial data

Source Invariance and Probabilistic Transfer: A Testable Theory of Probabilistic Neural Representations