Abstract:This article focuses on the problem of regulation of the application of the autonomous weapons systems from the perspective of the norms and principles of international humanitarian law. The article discusses the question of what restrictions are imposed on the application of such weapons in the international humanitarian law. The article presents a number of principles that must be met by both the weapons and their method of their application: distinction between civilians and combatants, military necessity, proportionality, prohibition on causing unnecessary suffering, and humanity. The author concludes that from the perspective of the principles of the international humanitarian law, it is doubtful if autonomous systems would be able to comply with these principles. Weapons that hit targets without human intervention have been applied for a long time, but they have never had the independence that they have now. The issue of compliance of autonomous weapons systems with the international humanitarian law can be considered if sufficient experience of application of such weapons in real conditions is accumulated. This study demonstrates that it is impossible to say that autonomous weapons systems do not comply with the principles of humanitarian law in general. The paper provides policy recommendations and assessments for each of the principles under consideration. The author also concludes that it would be necessary not to prohibit autonomous weapons, because they do not comply with the principles of international humanitarian law, but to develop rules for their application and for human participation in their functioning. A significant challenge to the development of such rules is the opacity of these autonomous weapons systems, if we look at them as at the complex intelligent computer systems.

The role of the United Nations in addressing emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons systems

The Role of the Ethical Underpinnings of International Humanitarian Law in the Age of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems

Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems [Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues]

Examining Lethal Autonomous Weapons through the Lens of International Humanitarian Law

Lethal Autonomous Weapons -- Ethical and Doctrinal Implications

"Killer Robots or Soldiers of the Future: Legal Issues and India's Role in the Lethal Autonomous Weapons Debate"

Spotlight Session on Autonomous Weapons Systems at ICRC 34th International Conference

Man against machine: Debates in the expert community on the lethal autonomous systems

Lethal autonomous robotics: Rethinking the dehumanization of warfare

Why the United States Must Adopt Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems

To ban or not to ban. Analyzing the banning process of autonomous weapon systems

The Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Law of Armed Conflict

Prospects for the global governance of autonomous weapons: comparing Chinese, Russian, and US practices

Development of the Discussions on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems Under Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons

Friend or frenemy? The role of trust in human-machine teaming and lethal autonomous weapons systems

Regulating lethal autonomous weapon systems: exploring the challenges of explainability and traceability

Development of russian and international legal regulation of the use of lethal autonomous weapon systems equipped with artificial intelligence

Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS): Towards global regulation or indiscriminate employment?

General Legal Limits of the Application of the Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems within the Purview of International Humanitarian Law

New technologies and AI: envisioning future directions for UNSCR 1540

Autonomous Weapon Systems and Human Control