Abstract:In September 2016, hoping to quiet fears about “killer robots,” then-Defense Secretary Ashton Carter promised that whatever weapons systems the United States might develop in the future, “there’s always going to [be] human judgment and discretion.” * J.D. Candidate, Georgetown University Law Center, 2018; M.A. in Security Studies, Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, 2011; B.A., University of California-Riverside, 2001. © 2017, Michael Press. 1. Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. & Colin Clark, Killer Robots? ‘Never,’ Defense Secretary Carter Says, BREAKING DEFENSE (Sep. 15, 2016, 4:00AM), http://breakingdefense.com/2016/09/killer-robots never-says-defense-secretary-carter/. 1337 Carter’s policy assurance on the future development of autono mous weapons systems (AWS) was clearly informed by ethical considerations, but it also had a distinct basis in the law of armed conflict (LOAC), embodied in various international treaties. This Note will conduct an analysis of the legal regime surrounding the construction and use of these AWS. In order to do so, it will examine similar weapons systems utilized by the U.S. military in various operations across the globe and current U.S. doctrine on the use of robotic autonomy in weapons, as well as the arguments for and against their fielding. An overview of LOAC and international humanitarian law (IHL) principles will also be explored through a clearly articulated legal review that should be undertaken before any weapon is legally allowed to operate in a battlespace. Subsequently, that legal review will be applied to AWS to investigate whether these weapons systems should be legally prohibited and how certain uses should be restricted. This Note asserts that there is nothing from a legal perspective that fundamentally prohibits the use of AWS in combat situations. However, similar to other weapons, it is the implementation of AWS that could come into conflict with LOAC and IHL. Recommendations for creating and using AWS in line with international legal principles will be interspersed throughout the Note and summarized in the conclusion. Key recommendations include limiting the use of AWS to situations where a system can reliably and predictably abide by the core principles of LOAC, as well as establishing standards and guidelines to ensure that AWS are fielded in such a manner. GEORGETOWN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

Autonomous Weapon Systems and Human Control

Spotlight Session on Autonomous Weapons Systems at ICRC 34th International Conference

Prospects for the global governance of autonomous weapons: comparing Chinese, Russian, and US practices

To ban or not to ban. Analyzing the banning process of autonomous weapon systems

The Role of the Ethical Underpinnings of International Humanitarian Law in the Age of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems

General Legal Limits of the Application of the Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems within the Purview of International Humanitarian Law

A Comparative Analysis of the Definitions of Autonomous Weapons Systems

Autonomous drone swarms and the contested imaginaries of artificial intelligence

OF ROBOTS AND RULES : AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS IN THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT

Accountability and Control Over Autonomous Weapon Systems: A Framework for Comprehensive Human Oversight

Meaningful human command: Advance control directives as a method to enable moral and legal responsibility for autonomous weapons systems

Examining Lethal Autonomous Weapons through the Lens of International Humanitarian Law

Human dignity and lethal autonomous weapon systems: A Christian ethical positioning from a Catholic point of view

Toward a Science of Autonomy for Physical Systems: Defense

The weaponization of artificial intelligence: What the public needs to be aware of

Lethal autonomous robotics: Rethinking the dehumanization of warfare

Prohibiting Autonomous Weapons: Put Human Dignity First

Lethal Autonomous Weapons -- Ethical and Doctrinal Implications

Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems [Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues]

AI-Powered Autonomous Weapons Risk Geopolitical Instability and Threaten AI Research

Trust or Bust: Ensuring Trustworthiness in Autonomous Weapon Systems