Specific Learning Disabilities Identification: Do the Identification Methods and Data Matter?

Kathrin E. Maki,Sarah R. Adams
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948719826296
2019-02-04
Learning Disability Quarterly
Abstract:Specific learning disabilities (SLD) identification has consistently been shown to be problematic; however, research has largely focused on SLD identification using test scores only. The present study, therefore, examined SLD identification decisions across identification methods and student evaluation data levels, including test scores, background information, and observations. Participants included 461 school psychologists who were randomly assigned to one of 12 conditions to make identification decisions. Results indicated that response to intervention (RtI) methods resulted in greater identification consistency than ability-achievement discrepancy while pattern of strengths and weaknesses (PSW) resulted in lower identification consistency than ability-achievement discrepancy. However, background information and observation data did not impact SLD identification consistency. Implications for practice and research are also discussed.
education, special,rehabilitation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?