Abstract:The authors show how habitat features shaped variation in local population size in great tits, and how population size subsequently affected social structure. However, much of the observed social structure was still shaped by social processes such as the birds' preference to forage in flocks and social relationships between them. The structure of animal societies is a key determinant of many ecological and evolutionary processes. Yet, we know relatively little about the factors and mechanisms that underpin detailed social structure. Among other factors, social structure can be influenced by habitat configuration. By shaping animal movement decisions, heterogeneity in habitat features, such as vegetation and the availability of resources, can influence the spatiotemporal distribution of individuals and subsequently key socioecological properties such as the local population size and density. Differences in local population size and density can impact opportunities for social associations and may thus drive substantial variation in local social structure. Here, we investigated spatiotemporal variation in population size at 65 distinct locations in a small songbird, the great tit (Parus major) and its effect on social network structure. We first explored the within‐location consistency of population size from weekly samples and whether the observed variation in local population size was predicted by the underlying habitat configuration. Next, we created social networks from the birds' foraging associations at each location for each week and examined if local population size affected social structure. We show that population size is highly repeatable within locations across weeks and years and that some of the observed variation in local population size was predicted by the underlying habitat, with locations closer to the forest edge having on average larger population sizes. Furthermore, we show that local population size affected social structure inferred by four global network metrics. Using simple simulations, we then reveal that much of the observed social structure is shaped by social processes. Across different population sizes, the birds' social structure was largely explained by their preference to forage in flocks. In addition, over and above effects of social foraging, social preferences between birds (i.e. social relationships) shaped certain network features such as the extent of realized social connections. Our findings thus suggest that individual social decisions substantially contribute to shaping certain social network features over and above effects of population size alone.

Group and individual social network metrics are robust to changes in resource distribution in experimental populations of forked fungus beetles

Social interactions among ants are impacted by food availability and group size

Social interactions are impacted by food availability, food type, and group size

What you have, not who you know: food-enhanced social capital and changes in social behavioural relationships in a non-human primate

Population age structure shapes selection on social behaviour in a long-lived insect

Social network centrality predicts dietary decisions in a wild bird population

Cockroach social network position does not influence exploration tendency

Plant metabolites modulate social networks and lifespan in a sawfly

Mechanisms of network evolution: a focus on socioecological factors, intermediary mechanisms, and selection pressures

A complex social structure with fission-fusion properties can emerge from a simple foraging model

Ant social network structure is highly conserved across species

Lack of ecological context can create the illusion of social success in Dictyostelium discoideum

Reverse social contagion as a mechanism for regulating mass behaviors in highly integrated social systems

The role of social attraction and social avoidance in shaping modular networks

Social patch foraging theory in an egalitarian group

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN LEAF-CUTTER ANTS AND FUNGUS GARDEN: EFFECTS OF DIVISION OF LABOR, AGE POLYETHISM, AND EGG CANNIBALISM

It's about time: Feeding competition costs of sociality are affected more by temporal characteristics than spatial distribution

Variation in local population size predicts social network structure in wild songbirds

Game theory elucidates how competitive dynamics mediate animal social networks

Ecological networks across interaction types are modular and highly driven by sampling intensity at biogeographical scales

Plant metabolites modulate animal social networks and lifespan