Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to examine different types of sharing platforms based on risk perceptions of product/service providers and users, and to illustrate appropriate platform regulation preferences. Design/methodology/approach A survey was used (N = 540) to collect data on platform participants' risk perceptions and regulation preferences in the Chinese (N = 263) and the US markets (N = 277). Cluster analysis and multiple correspondence analysis were used to categorise platforms and match their regulation preferences with the risk characteristics. Findings The results show that i) four types of sharing platforms are categorised in terms of the risk perceived by the supply and demand side, and ii) four types of regulation preferences are clustered, drawing on the power and trust elements proposed from the slippery slope framework. Furthermore, coercive power regulation is favoured by participants of platforms with high supply risk and low demand risk, legitimate power regulation is preferred by actors of platforms with low supply risk and high demand risk, reason-based trust regulation is preferred by actors of platforms with high supply and demand risk, and implicit trust regulation is favoured by participants of platforms with low supply and demand risk. Research limitations/implications This paper develops an empirical typology of platforms based on risk perceptions of providers and users, and advances our understanding about lateral exchange markets from a consumer perspective. Practical implications This paper provides implications for platforms to regulate transactions through two mechanisms – the power of platforms and trust in platform participants. Originality/value Regulating by power ensures transaction security while regulating by trust enhances transaction efficiency, so it is important to configure the power and trust elements in platform regulation in an appropriate manner. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper is one of the first attempts at addressing platform regulation and shows how consumers' risk perception of platforms can lead to important implications for theory and practice in marketing and better regulation of platform transactions.

How do tax compliance labels impact sharing platform consumers? An empirical study on the interplay of trust, moral, and intention to book

You don't need an invoice, do you? An online experiment on collaborative tax evasion

The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework

A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in the sharing economy

Digital Identity: The Effect of Trust and Reputation Information on User Judgement in the Sharing Economy

Sharing economy platforms: An equity theory perspective on reciprocity and commitment

Gaming the System: An Investigation of Small Business Owners' Attitudes to Tax Avoidance, Tax Planning, and Tax Evasion

The Effect of Platform Data Quality on Tax Compliance in Digital Economy: A Multiagent Based Simulation

Sharing with perfect strangers: The effects of self-disclosure on consumers’ trust, risk perception, and behavioral intention in the sharing economy

Fostering trust: When the rhetoric of sharing can backfire

The impact of firm innovativeness on consumer trust in the sharing economy: a moderated mediation model

Exploring the language of the sharing economy: Building trust and reducing privacy concern on Airbnb in German and English

Regulating sharing platforms in lateral exchange markets: the role of power and trust

Using behavioural economics to understand tax compliance

A self-employed taxpayer experimental study on trust, power, and tax compliance in eleven countries

Trust to Share : Investigating the Key Factors to Influence Tenants’ Participation in Online Short-Term Rent

Design of TAM-based framework for credibility and trend analysis in sharing economy: Behavioral intention and user experience on Airbnb as an instance

The Influence of Self-Regulation of Sharing Economy: Evidence from Unstructured Data

A Behavioral Economics Approach to Digitalization

Trust Transfer in Sharing Accommodation: The Moderating Role of Privacy Concerns