Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to examine different types of sharing platforms based on risk perceptions of product/service providers and users, and to illustrate appropriate platform regulation preferences. Design/methodology/approach A survey was used (N = 540) to collect data on platform participants' risk perceptions and regulation preferences in the Chinese (N = 263) and the US markets (N = 277). Cluster analysis and multiple correspondence analysis were used to categorise platforms and match their regulation preferences with the risk characteristics. Findings The results show that i) four types of sharing platforms are categorised in terms of the risk perceived by the supply and demand side, and ii) four types of regulation preferences are clustered, drawing on the power and trust elements proposed from the slippery slope framework. Furthermore, coercive power regulation is favoured by participants of platforms with high supply risk and low demand risk, legitimate power regulation is preferred by actors of platforms with low supply risk and high demand risk, reason-based trust regulation is preferred by actors of platforms with high supply and demand risk, and implicit trust regulation is favoured by participants of platforms with low supply and demand risk. Research limitations/implications This paper develops an empirical typology of platforms based on risk perceptions of providers and users, and advances our understanding about lateral exchange markets from a consumer perspective. Practical implications This paper provides implications for platforms to regulate transactions through two mechanisms – the power of platforms and trust in platform participants. Originality/value Regulating by power ensures transaction security while regulating by trust enhances transaction efficiency, so it is important to configure the power and trust elements in platform regulation in an appropriate manner. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper is one of the first attempts at addressing platform regulation and shows how consumers' risk perception of platforms can lead to important implications for theory and practice in marketing and better regulation of platform transactions.

Fostering trust: When the rhetoric of sharing can backfire

The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework

The impact of firm innovativeness on consumer trust in the sharing economy: a moderated mediation model

A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in the sharing economy

The Sharing Economy: Rhetoric and Reality

Building Trust in Digital Platforms for Sharing Collaborative Lifestyles in Sustainable Contexts

Sharing economy platforms: An equity theory perspective on reciprocity and commitment

Sharing with perfect strangers: The effects of self-disclosure on consumers’ trust, risk perception, and behavioral intention in the sharing economy

Excess reciprocity distorts reputation in online social networks

Digital Identity: The Effect of Trust and Reputation Information on User Judgement in the Sharing Economy

Unpeel the layers of trust! A comparative analysis of crowdfunding platforms and what they do to generate trust

Boosting Sharing Economy: Social Welfare or Revenue Driven?

Strategic pricing, lifespan choices and environmental implications of peer-to-peer sharing

Banned from the sharing economy: an agent-based model of a peer-to-peer marketplace for consumer goods and services

The application of Aristotle’s rhetorical theory to the sharing economy: an empirical study of Airbnb

EXPRESS: Individual Sellers’ Social Media Participation and Sales Performance in Peer-to-Peer Marketplaces: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

The Sharing Economy: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

Destructive Sharing Economy: A Passage from Status to Contract

Regulating sharing platforms in lateral exchange markets: the role of power and trust

Marketing in the Sharing Economy