Abstract:Background: Climate change, largely triggered by human-induced greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions, seems unstoppable. There was a strong rebound of anthropogenic emissions of CO 2, the preponderant GHG in terms of contribution to global warming, around the world after the COVID-19 lockdown. Also, there is still no widely accepted international treaty on curbing the anthropogenic emissions of CH 4 and N 2O, the second and third predominant GHG, respectively, so far. Thereby, prima facie, in respect to mitigating climate change, currently, humans have no aces up their sleeves. It seems that current temperature rise is not high enough to take alarm until the occurrence of tipping point. Policy: Climate-related international treaties, such as 2016 Paris agreement, are compromises among conflicting geopolitical pressures. However, currently, the climate treaties show little mandatory binding force on the signatories who are able to violate and then get off scot-free, thus may end up like a nostrum. Throughout the European history, I find that the only way, if at all, to achieve the peace or obedience of a treaty is via balancing powers, embodied in Bismarck's Realpolitik of Germany and Richelieu's Raison d'état of France. Similarly, the Chinese history in East Asia proved the significance of unadulterated ideological neutrality and Darwinian adaptability in the kaleidoscope of evolving circumstances in maintaining order and enforcement of international treaties through balancing the power of rivalries to constrain ever-recurring challengers for equilibrium. Recommendations: A successful policy needs to make a thorough analysis of all relevant factors to form a long-term strategic notion. Then, statesmen need to distill an array of nebulous, always contradictory options into a tenacious, controllable direction. Thereby, I suggest that, for better curbing global warming, climate agreements or climate club be incorporated into an overall geopolitical framework among the international communities.

Support for climate unilateralism

Unilateral or Reciprocal Climate Policy? Experimental Evidence from China

Domestic Provision of Global Public Goods: How Other Countries’ Behavior Affects Public Support for Climate Policy

Social Norms and the Effect of Unilateral Actions on Climate Change

The consequences of non-participation in the Paris Agreement

China, the United States and the European Union: Multiple Bilateralism and Prospects for a New Climate Change Diplomacy

Differentiated Responsibilities and Prosocial Behavior in Climate Change Mitigation: Behavioral Evidence from the United States and China

Can US multi-state climate mitigation agreements work? A perspective from embedded emission flows

Identifying the most important predictors of support for climate policy in the United States

Research on the Synergy Mechanism of Multiple Subjects in Global Climate Governance: Based on the Perspective of the Evolutionary Game of Carbon Neutral Strategy Between China, the US, and the EU

U.S. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: Reasons, Impacts and China's Response

Climate politics in global Hobbesian Jungle

Cooperation and Divergence between China and the United States in the Governance of Global Climate Change

Leading the Global Race to Zero Emissions: A New China-U.S. Climate Agenda

China-US Climate Cooperation: Creating a New Model of Major-Country Relations?

Discussion and Analysis of the Climate Cooperation Prospect among China, the United States and the Europe Union in the Context of Emission Reduction Diplomacy

Positive, global, and health or environment framing bolsters public support for climate policies

Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action

External coercion and public support: The case of the US–China trade war

Could More Civil Society Involvement Increase Public Support for Climate Policy-Making? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in China

Climate Change Policies of the Trump Administration and China's Response