Abstract:To the Editor: First, we thank the editor for giving us an opportunity to respond to the letter written by Dr Noor et al.1 We appreciate the interest shown by Dr Noor and colleagues in our recent publication on the role of pelvic compensation in sagittal balance and imbalance.2 Their letter highlights significant points that complement and extend the findings of our study. We are pleased to provide detailed responses to their observations and suggestions. RECOGNITION OF THE STUDY'S CONTRIBUTIONS We are grateful for the acknowledgment of our work's importance in elucidating the role of pelvic compensation in surgical outcomes for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Our study aimed to fill gaps in the current understanding of pelvic compensation's impact on sagittal balance (SB) and imbalance and to provide insights that can inform clinical practices and future research. SAGITTAL BALANCE OBSERVATIONS The authors correctly note that our study found analogous performance in the SRS-22r domains at baseline and follow-up for both failed pelvic compensation (FPC) and successful pelvic compensation groups under preoperative SB conditions. This finding underscores the complexity of sagittal alignment and the multifactorial nature of its clinical outcomes. Despite their more severe preoperative sagittal deformity, the superior postoperative alignment observed in the successful pelvic compensation group suggests that patients with effective pelvic compensation mechanisms are better positioned for favorable radiographic outcomes. These results support the need for individualized treatment plans that consider the unique compensatory capacities of each patient. RESTORING SPINOPELVIC BALANCE We concur with the emphasis on achieving optimal SB to enhance functional outcomes and health-related quality of life. The goal of spinal deformity surgery is not only to correct anatomic abnormalities but also to restore functional alignment that supports daily activities and reduces pain. The concept of "dynamic sagittal balance" introduced by the authors is particularly relevant as it highlights the importance of considering patient movement and postural changes in surgical planning.3,4 Future studies should focus on integrating dynamic assessments into preoperative evaluations to better predict and improve postoperative outcomes. DYNAMIC SAGITTAL IMBALANCE The authors' points about considering dynamic gait patterns and compensatory mechanisms are well-taken. Our study primarily focused on static radiographic parameters, but we recognize the significance of dynamic assessments. Parameters observed during walking, as compared with standing, can provide valuable insights into the compensatory mechanisms at play. Incorporating these dynamic factors into preoperative planning could help tailor surgical interventions to better address the functional needs of patients with ASD.5,6 MULTIFACTORIAL NATURE OF FPC We acknowledge the multifactorial nature of FPC and the need for comprehensive evaluation. The degeneration of paraspinal muscles, as highlighted by Dr Han et al,7 is one of many potential factors contributing to FPC. Our study identified a low Pelvic Tilt/Pelvic Incidence ratio as an indicator of FPC, but we agree that a holistic approach is necessary to fully understand and address the underlying causes. Future research should explore the interactions between muscular degeneration, spinal alignment, and pelvic compensation to develop more effective treatment strategies. FUTURE RESEARCH ON SEVERE DSI We appreciate the recommendation for further analysis of patients with severe dynamic sagittal imbalance. The criteria provided by Dr Kim et al offer a valuable framework for identifying and managing severe cases.8 We also thank Dr Md Moshiur Rahman and colleagues for their thoughtful letter and valuable contributions to the discussion. Their insights and suggestions will undoubtedly guide future research and improve clinical practices in the management of ASD.

ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2019: biomechanical changes in dynamic sagittal balance and lower limb compensatory strategies following realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity patients

Stronger association of objective physical metrics with baseline patient-reported outcome measures than preoperative standing sagittal parameters for adult spinal deformity patients

Persistent Lower Extremity Compensation for Sagittal Imbalance After Surgical Correction of Complex Adult Spinal Deformity: A Radiographic Analysis of Early Impact

Use of a Triaxial Accelerometer to Measure Changes in Gait Sway and Related Motor Function after Corrective Spinal Fusion Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity

Clinical Outcomes of S2 Alar-Iliac (S2AI) Screw Technique in the Treatment of Severe Spinal Sagittal Imbalance: A Retrospective 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Clinical Outcomes of S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Technique in the Treatment of Severe Spinal Sagittal Imbalance: a Retrospective 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Quantitative assessment of muscle activity of back and lower extremities, whole body sagittal alignment, body sway, and health-related quality of life in adult spinal deformity patients before and after spinopelvic correction surgery: From the standpoint of the "cone of economy"

Reassessment System and Staged Surgical Strategy with Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treatment of Severe Adult Spinal Deformities

Spinal sagittal balance status affects postoperative actual falls and quality of life after decompression and fusion in-situ surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

In Reply: the Role of Pelvic Compensation in Sagittal Balance and Imbalance: the Impact of Pelvic Compensation on Spinal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes after Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

The utilization of second sacral alar-iliac screw fixation technique in the treatment of adult spinal deformity: analysis of risk factors for postoperative sagittal imbalance

The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Sagittal Spinal Realignment Targets in Long-Construct Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Early Impact

Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comprehensive Review of Current Advances and Future Directions

How Good Are Surgeons at Achieving Their Preoperative Goal Sagittal Alignment Following Adult Deformity Surgery?

Influence of Posture on Gait Parameters in Severe Symptomatic Lumbar Stenosis Before and After Decompression Surgery

P158. Preoperative supine pelvic incidence predicts standing pelvic incidence following S2AI fixation in patients with adult spinal deformity: a prospective study

Longitudinal impact of multi-segment spinal fixation surgery on mobility status and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity: a multicenter retrospective study

Gait kinematic alterations in subjects with adult spinal deformity and their radiological determinants

Axial Symptoms and Spinal-pelvic Parameters After Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Predictors of pelvic tilt normalization: a multicenter study on the impact of regional and lower-extremity compensation on pelvic alignment after complex adult spinal deformity surgery

Comparison of Surgical Burden, Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes According to the Severity of Baseline Sagittal Imbalance in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients