Abstract:Compared with financial information, whether corporate social responsibility disclosure has impacts on debt financing cost has obviously become a heated topic in the academic. This paper selects A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets of China from 2013 to 2017 as sample to study the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost, including bond financing cost and bank loan cost. In addition, this paper divides the sample into voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure group and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure group and studies whether the effects of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost and bank loan cost are different. The empirical results are presented as follows: Firstly, enterprise disclosing high-quality corporate social responsibility report is more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost. Specifically, corporate social responsibility disclosure significantly lowers both the bond financing cost and bank loan cost. Moreover, the reduction impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost is greater than that of bank loan cost. Secondly, enterprises voluntarily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than that of enterprises mandatorily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports. Thirdly, non-state-owned enterprises are more conducive to reducing debt financing cost than that of state-owned enterprise. The enterprises with more market competition are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than the oligopolistic enterprises. Finally, this paper concludes and gives policy implications. This paper amplifies the literature regarding the economic consequences of corporate social responsibility disclosure and improves the understanding of the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost.

The Influence of Ownership Structure and Board Independence on the Cost of Debt in BRIC Countries

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Ownership Structure and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from Chinese Corporate Bond Market

Debt of Bank, Institutional Environment and the Agent Cost of Controlling Shareholder

Debt structure and corporate performance in emerging markets

Debt impact on the costs of agency conflicts, considering companies’ ownership structure

Can't Debt Come into Play Governance Effect Really?The New Evidence Based on the Listed Real Estate Companies in China

Ownership Structure and the Cost of Debt

The effect of corporate governance on debt financing cost of listed companies

Ownership, Institutions, and Capital Structure: Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility and debt financing cost: evidence from China

Navigating the trade‐off between corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of financing: Evidence from BRICS economies

The Impact of Corporate Reputation on Cost of Debt: A Panel Data Analysis of Indian Listed Firms

The influence of internal corporate governance mechanisms on capital structure decisions of Chinese listed firms

How Do Board Reforms Affect Debt Financing Costs Around the World?

Corporate capital structure in BRICS economies: An integrated analysis of ESG, firm, industry, and macroeconomic determinants

Corporate Sustainability and Capital Costs: A Panel Evidence from BRICS Countries

Foreign ownership and cost of debt financing: evidence from an emerging market

Social capital and cost of debt: Evidence from Chinese CEO network centrality

Does board diversity affect the cost of debt financing? Empirical evidence from Turkey

Environmental Performance, the Role of Sustainable Development, and Board Diversity on Debt Costs in State-Owned Enterprises