Abstract:PurposeThis study examines the bi-directional relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) and ownership structure through a dynamic empirical framework in an emerging economy context.Design/methodology/approachData over 10 years are used to investigate the response of disclosure to ownership structure variables and vice versa. Dynamic bi-directional relationships are hypothesised and empirically investigated using a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) model. The ownership structure variables used are government ownership, block ownership and director ownership, while CSRD is constructed as a score through content analysis.FindingsA bi-directional negative relationship between CSRD and government ownership is found, revealing a preference for the state to invest in companies with opaque disclosure. CSRD is found to respond negatively to block ownership, albeit weakly. Results also show that directors prefer to own shares in the company they manage when there are low levels of CSRD.Research limitations/implicationsThe current empirical set-up of using a small emerging economy may not carry to the context of larger emerging economies where the institutional context may differ. Thus, future research could use this dynamic empirical approach to re-examine the questions raised in this paper using data from other emerging economies. The use of a longer time series makes it feasible to explore further analysis what was not possible in this study, such as an impulse response analysis examining the reaction of the variables of interest, CSRD and ownership variables for a specific time horizon to particular changes or shocks associated with one of the endogenous variables in the PVAR.Practical implicationsA major implication is that expecting disclosure practices to improve due to government and director initiatives would be less likely in emerging economies. State and director shareholders prefer to invest in opaque companies because they may purposely choose to keep the minimum disclosure levels. The paper calls for a transparent process and ethical guidelines to guide government investment in firms.Originality/valueThe study investigates the bi-directional relationship between ownership structure and CSRD in contrast to the existing literature's presupposed one-way relationship between these variables by demonstrating that bi-directionality does matter. This paper also contributes to the CSRD literature in the emerging economy context. The bi-directional negative relationship between CSRD and government ownership calls for a transparent selection process of board members as representatives of the state in those companies where the government has an ownership stake. It also calls for a transparent process and ethical guidelines to guide government investment in firms.

Navigating the trade‐off between corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of financing: Evidence from BRICS economies

How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Have Influence on Firms' Access to Trade Credit

Corporate Sustainability and Capital Costs: A Panel Evidence from BRICS Countries

Transparency Pays: How Carbon Emission Disclosure Lowers Cost of Capital

Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency

Tax avoidance, CSR performance and financial impacts: evidence from BRICS economies

CSR disclosure and ownership structure: insights from a dynamic empirical framework using an emerging economy context

Does corporate social responsibility mediate the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance? Empirical evidence from BRICS countries

Corporate social responsibility transparency and trade credit financing

Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Moderating role of firm characteristics on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: evidence from India

Corporate Carbon Information Disclosure and Financing Costs: The Moderating Effect of Sustainable Development

Which Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Affects the Cost of Equity? Evidence from Korea

Can enhanced CSR quality reduce the cost of debt capital? An empirical analysis of CEO expertise and non-financial reporting practices in China

ESG Disclosure and the Cost of Capital: Is There a Ratcheting Effect over Time?

Corporate social responsibility, the cost of equity capital and ownership structure: An analysis of Chinese listed firms

Do CSR performance and reporting facilitate access to debt financing in emerging markets? The role of asset structure and firm performance

Corporate social responsibility report readability, credit ratings and cost of borrowing

Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and the cost of equity: Evidence from East Asia