Abstract:Introduction: The TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) is the most commonly used ischemic stroke subtype classification system worldwide and a required field in the US National Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) registry. However, stroke diagnostics have advanced substantially since the TOAST classification was designed 30 years ago, potentially making it difficult to apply reliably. Methods: In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study, we analyzed consecutive ischemic stroke patients admitted to a Comprehensive Stroke Center between July–October 2021. Clinical practice TOAST classification diagnoses rendered by the stroke team in the electronic medical record (EMR) at discharge were retrieved from GWTG-Stroke registry and compared to a reference ("gold") standard diagnosis derived from agreement between two expert raters after review of the EMR and patient imaging. Results: Among 49 patients; age was 72.3 years (±12.1), 53% female, and presenting NIHSS median 3 (IQR 1–11). Work-up included: brain imaging in 100%; cardiac rhythm assessment in 100%; cervical/cerebral vessel imaging in 98%; TTE ± TEE in 92%; and TCD emboli evaluation in 51%. Reference standard diagnoses were: LAA-6%, SVD-14%, CE-39%, OTH-10%, UND-M (more than one cause)-20%, and UND-C (cryptogenic)-10%. GWTG-Stroke TOAST diagnoses agreed with reference standard diagnoses in 30/49 (61%). Among the 6 subtype diagnoses, specificity was generally high (84.8%–97.7%), but sensitivity suboptimal for LAA (33%), OTH (60%), UND-M (10%), and UND-C (20%). Positive predictive value was suboptimal for 5 of the 6 subtypes: LAA (13%), SVD (58%), OTH (75%), UND-M (50%), and UND-C (50%). Discussion: Clinical practice TOAST classification subtype diagnoses entered into the GWTG-Stroke registry were accurate in only 61% of patients, a performance rate that, if similarly present at other centers, would hamper the ability of the national registry to provide dependable insights into subtype-related care. Development of an updated ischemic stroke subtype classification system, with algorithmic logic embedded in electronic medical records, is desirable.

Comparison Study of ASCO and TOAST Classification System in Chinese Minor Stroke Patients

[A Study of Etiology Classification of Minor Stroke Based on TOAST and ASCO Systems].

Comparison of the Chinese Ischemic Stroke Subclassification and Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment Systems in Minor Stroke

Etiologic Classification of TIA and Minor Stroke by A-S-C-O and Causative Classification System as Compared to TOAST Reduces the Proportion of Patients Categorized as Cause Undetermined

Classification and Prognosis of Ischemic Stroke Subtypes According to NEW-TOAST Criteria

Classifying Ischemic Stroke, from TOAST to CISS

TOAST stroke subtype classification in clinical practice: implications for the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke nationwide registry

Inter-rater reliability of the A-S-C-O classification system for ischemic stroke

Etiological Classification of Cerebral Ischemic Stroke by the TOAST, SSS-TOAST, and ASCOD Systems: The Impact of Observer's Experience on Reliability.

Classification and Prognosis of Ischemic Stroke Subtypes According to TOAST Criteria:A Prospective Cohort Study

Classification and 90-day outcome of mild ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST criteria: a prospective cohort study

TOAST Subtypes, Risk Factors and Recurrence of Ischemic Stroke

The relationship between ischemic stroke subtypes according to the TOAST criteria and clinical prognosis

Ischaemic stroke etiological classification system: the agreement analysis of CISS, SPARKLE and TOAST

A study on the rating scale selection of ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST classification

Risk Factors, Clinical Features and Prognosis for Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke in a Chinese Population

Long-term outcomes among ischemic stroke TOAST subtypes: A 12-year Cohort study in China

Clinical Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Varying Definitions of Minor Stroke: From a Large-Scale Nation-Wide Longitudinal Registry.

Application significance of CISS classification on ischemic stroke and its comparison with TOAST classification

Analysis of TOAST Etiology Genotyping and Risk Factors and Recurrence of Ischemic Stroke

OCSP Subtypes and ESRS in Acute Non-Cardiac Ischemic Stroke