Abstract:This paper provides a critical review of CORE Econ’s The Economy and associated materials. It argues that there is a need for reworked economics textbooks and that CORE Econ’s approach to this project – to replace mathematical abstractions with relevant real-world economics and to overcome the free market bias of introductory economics course – is well-founded. It is argued that The Economy contains a wealth of material which, in the hands of a sophisticated teacher, could form the basis of excellent introductory and intermediate economics modules. Despite this, however, the paper argues that the newly charted path through the economics discipline – using game theory and market imperfections as the entry point – is not easy to traverse. The demotion of Marshallian supply and demand is welcome and overdue, but its replacement is not yet fully formed. The CORE Econ authors’ claim that they present a unified model in which microeconomics and macroeconomics are coherently integrated – a new Neoclassical Synthesis – is overstated. In particular, the paper argues that students who do not have substantial access to tutoring and mentoring will find the text hard. Those students with only limited guidance and support – due to large cohorts, outside commitments or other reasons – are likely to struggle to learn directly from the text. For this reason, The Economy may favour stronger students and elite institutions over those further down the academic hierarchy. Most fundamentally, it is argued, the issues that surface in The Economy go beyond the specific implementation of a textbook, and reflect problems with the discipline itself. The Economy reflects the view that all economic problems can ultimately be understood in terms of individual optimisation. This assumption is highly controversial. A deeper rethink of how we teach undergraduates in economics is needed.

Teaching Public Economics with Special Reference to Australian and US Cultures

The “practical mode of teaching” and the state of English studies in the United States

Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Intermediate Theory, Statistics and Econometrics, and Other Upper-Division Economics Courses: Results From a Sixth National Quinquennial Survey

Teaching introductory economic geography: one American perspective

Public Economics in an Age of Austerity

From public finance to public economics

Teaching democracy and capitalism: High engagement and "doing economics"

Understanding Diversity in Undergraduate Learning of Cost-Benefit Analysis

The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision

The Public Economics of Climate Change

Is Interactive/Active Learning Superior to Traditional Lecturing in Economics Courses?

Commentary on Teaching Economics with Podcasts, Literature and Movies

CORE Econ: a Neoclassical Synthesis for the twenty-first century?

The neoliberal cascade and education: an essay on the market agenda and its consequences

Reflections on Economics Education in China and Suggestions for Its Reform

Consensus among economists 2020—A sharpening of the picture

Teaching ethics in accounting: a discussion of cross-cultural factors with a focus on Confucian and Western philosophy

Economics with(out) ethics? An interdisciplinary encounter between public economists and John Rawls in the 1970s

Comparison of PBL and the Traditional Teaching Method in the Teaching of Economics

Teaching public financial management: An integrated approach to a critical subject

Neoliberal convergence in North America and Western Europe: Fiscal austerity, privatization, and public sector reform