Abstract:This paper provides a critical review of CORE Econ’s The Economy and associated materials. It argues that there is a need for reworked economics textbooks and that CORE Econ’s approach to this project – to replace mathematical abstractions with relevant real-world economics and to overcome the free market bias of introductory economics course – is well-founded. It is argued that The Economy contains a wealth of material which, in the hands of a sophisticated teacher, could form the basis of excellent introductory and intermediate economics modules. Despite this, however, the paper argues that the newly charted path through the economics discipline – using game theory and market imperfections as the entry point – is not easy to traverse. The demotion of Marshallian supply and demand is welcome and overdue, but its replacement is not yet fully formed. The CORE Econ authors’ claim that they present a unified model in which microeconomics and macroeconomics are coherently integrated – a new Neoclassical Synthesis – is overstated. In particular, the paper argues that students who do not have substantial access to tutoring and mentoring will find the text hard. Those students with only limited guidance and support – due to large cohorts, outside commitments or other reasons – are likely to struggle to learn directly from the text. For this reason, The Economy may favour stronger students and elite institutions over those further down the academic hierarchy. Most fundamentally, it is argued, the issues that surface in The Economy go beyond the specific implementation of a textbook, and reflect problems with the discipline itself. The Economy reflects the view that all economic problems can ultimately be understood in terms of individual optimisation. This assumption is highly controversial. A deeper rethink of how we teach undergraduates in economics is needed.

Consensus among economists 2020—A sharpening of the picture

For a Consensus on Controlling Income Inequality:What has Economics Contributed?

Public Awareness of the Scientific Consensus on Climate

Conventional wisdom, meta‐analysis, and research revision in economics

Economics in the Social Science Spectrum: Evolution and Overlap with Different Academic Areas

Convergence of economic growth and the Great Recession as seen from a Celestial Observatory

Evolutions and Contradictions in Mainstream Macroeconomics: The Case of Olivier Blanchard

Who Said or What Said? Estimating Ideological Bias in Views Among Economists

The Influence of Randomized Controlled Trials on Development Economics Research and on Development Policy

Public Economics in an Age of Austerity

Impact versus Inclusion in the Economics Profession: Insights from the Papers and Proceedings

Political Language in Economics

The economic way of thinking in a pandemic

CORE Econ: a Neoclassical Synthesis for the twenty-first century?

Is economic history changing its nature? Evidence from top journals

Economics with(out) ethics? An interdisciplinary encounter between public economists and John Rawls in the 1970s

From public finance to public economics

The Age of the Applied Economist: The Transformation of Economics Since the 1970s

Against the Consensus: Reflections on the Great Recession

Agent Based-Stock Flow Consistent Macroeconomics: Towards a Benchmark Model

Opening the gates: The increasing impact of papers beyond the top five and other changes in economic publishing