The role of theory for understanding and preventing suicide (but not predicting it): A commentary on Hjelmeland and Knizek

E. David Klonsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1594005
2019-04-15
Death Studies
Abstract:Hjelmeland and Knizek suggest that parsimonious theory is inappropriate for explaining a highly complex and contextual phenomenon like suicide. Similar suggestions have been made by others. In this commentary, I counter that the pursuit of parsimonious theory is at the core of any scientific enterprise, including health sciences and suicide science. Using examples from physics and psychology, I illustrate that parsimonious theories have been essential for understanding highly complex and contextual phenomena like the motion of objects and the behavior of people. I further illustrate that these theories, despite their undeniable validity and enormous utility, have limited value for predicting future real-world events; thus, it is important not to conflate valid theory with highly accurate prediction of the future. To conclude, I offer suggestions for better evaluating and advancing suicide theory, and I affirm that the pursuit of parsimonious suicide theory is important and worthwhile, and must continue.
social sciences, biomedical,psychology, multidisciplinary,social issues
What problem does this paper attempt to address?