Abstract:Background/Context The Race to the Top federal initiatives and requirements surrounding waivers of No Child Left Behind promoted expanded use of value-added models (VAMs) to evaluate teachers. Even after passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) relaxed these requirements, allowing more flexibility and local control, many states and districts continue to use VAMs in teacher evaluation systems, suggesting that they consider VAMs a valid measure of teacher effectiveness. Scholars in the fields of economics, education, and quantitative methods continue to debate several aspects of VAMs’ validity for this purpose, however. Purpose The purpose of this study was to directly ask the most experienced VAM scholars about validity of VAM use in teacher evaluation based on the aspects of validity described in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and found in a review of high-quality peer-reviewed literature on VAMs. Participants We invited the 115 scholars listed as an author or coauthor of one or more of the 145 articles published on evaluating teachers with VAMs that have been published in prominent peer-reviewed journals between 2002 and implementation of ESSA in 2016. In this article, we analyze data from 36 respondents (12 economists, 13 educators, and 11 methodologists) who rated themselves as “experienced scholars,” “experts,” or “leading experts” on VAMs. Research Design This article reports both quantitative and qualitative analyses of a survey questionnaire completed by experienced VAM scholars. Findings Analyses of 44 Likert-scale items indicate that respondents were generally neutral or mixed toward the use of VAMs in teacher evaluation, though responses from educational researchers were more critical of VAM use than were responses from economists and quantitative methodologists. Qualitative analysis of free response comments suggests that participants oppose exclusive or high-stakes use of VAMs but are more supportive of their use as a component of evaluation systems that use multiple measures. Conclusions These findings suggest that scholars and stakeholders from different disciplines and backgrounds think about VAMs and VAM use differently. We argue that it is important to understand and address stakeholders’ multiple perspectives to find the common ground on which to build consensus.

Teacher-Level Value-Added Models on Trial: Empirical and Pragmatic Issues of Concern Across Five Court Cases

Value-Added Model (VAM) Scholars on Using VAMs for Teacher Evaluation After the Passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act

A Florida Teacher Wrongfully Terminated? Alleged (Mis)Uses of Value-Added Model (VAM) Estimates for High-Stakes Teacher Evaluation Decisions

Value-Added Modeling and Educational Accountability

Teacher Value-Added at the High-School Level

An alternative, curriculum-based value-added model for teacher preparation programmes: a research summary

Value-Added Models for Teacher Preparation Programs: Validity and Reliability Threats, and a Manageable Alternative

A Rational and Manageable Value-Added Model for Teacher Preparation Programs

A Potential Outcomes View of Value-Added Assessment in Education

Models for Value-Added Modeling of Teacher Effects

Missing data in value-added modeling of teacher effects

A comparison of value-added models for school accountability

School value-added models for multivariate academic and non-academic outcomes: A more rounded approach to using student data to inform school accountability

A Correlated Random Effects Model for Nonignorable Missing Data in Value-Added Assessment of Teacher Effects

Grading Teacher Performance Appraisal Systems: Understanding the Implications of Student Test Scores and Performance Information Use

Stability of Teacher Value-Added Rankings Across Measurement Model and Scaling Conditions

Accounting for Co-Teaching: A Guide for Policymakers and Developers of Value-Added Models

An Evaluation of Empirical Bayes’s Estimation of Value-Added Teacher Performance Measures

Stakes Matter: Student Motivation and the Validity of Student Assessments for Teacher Evaluation

Rethinking principal effects on student outcomes

The Effect of the Prior Teacher on Value-Added