Two Studies of Emotion: Crying and Anger Control@@@Crying: The Mystery of Tears.@@@Anger: The Struggle of Emotional Control in America's History.
Muriel Langseth,W. Frey,C. Stearns,T. Scheff,P. Stearns
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2069865
1987-07-01
Abstract:Two new studies continue the surge of interest in the investigation of human emotion. Although the style and content of the two books are utterly different, each makes a contribution to the body of research in its respective area. The Frey volume focuses on a narrow and fairly microscopic matter, the nature of individual tears and crying. The Steams volume, by contrast, attacks a vast historical problem, continuity and change in the social control of anger over the last three hundred years. With each book, I will first describe the method and findings, then evaluate them. To conclude, I draw upon the differences between the approaches in the two books to call attention to the issue of style and substance. The book on crying has two main thrusts: the chemistry of tears (Frey is a biochemist) and studies of adult crying. Frey believes that emotional tears may involve what might be thought of as physical catharsis-that tears might help discharge stress-related substances from the body. As he indicates, this hypothesis has yet to be demonstrated. What he has found (as have two other independent researchers whose work he cites) is that emotional tears are chemically different from tears caused by irritants (e.g., onions). The major difference is the amount of protein: the concentration in emotional tears is more than twenty percent higher. His recent studies are not conclusive, but they suggest that some of this difference is produced by differences in levels of neurotransmitters, including an endorphine. If this finding is accurate, it suggests that emotional tears might play a part, chemically, in determining levels of pleasure and pain in the body. The second focus of the book is adult crying behavior. Using interviews, questionnaires, and diaries, Frey has conducted a series of fairly simple studies of the causes, concomitants, and effects of crying. The reporting of the findings is casual and incomplete. (Reference to an article which gives a fuller report of his findings can be found hidden in chapter 4, note 9.) Even so, some of the findings are of interest. As has been reported in earlier studies, gender differences are large. Frey reports that men cry "less conspicuously, less often, with less flowing tears." However, he does report one way in which there was little difference between the male and female subjects: Sobbing was infrequent for both women (it occurred in only fourteen percent of the instances reported) and for men (ten percent). Although there have been earlier studies of adult crying, several of which Frey cites, there is still no clear picture of the issues and questions which need to be investigated. It seems necessary to add a word about the style and substance of this book. Academics are likely to be put off by the style; it is clearly addressed to a popular market. There is a tone of unguarded enthusiasm for the subject of crying, and the citation and referencing practices are irregular and uneven. In spite of the style, however, this little book has substance. The author has the knack of clear-sighted observation and inference, and even more strongly, of asking new and potentially important questions. For the person, whether personal or professional, with an interest in emotions, this book may well repay a very close, even word-forword, reading. With the second book to be reviewed here, we enter an entirely different realm, both in style and substance. The style is academic rather than popular. On the surface, at least, the approach is highly professional. The underlying idea is to examine, in great depth, a current controversy about anger: should anger be expressed, or should it be held in? The most recent phase of this ancient debate began with a series of laboratory experiments by Berkowitz, showing that retaliation against aggression does not decrease the level of anger and aggression, and may even increase it. These studies, and replications by others, formed the basis of a critique of the practice of the unlimited acting out of anger in encounter groups and other therapy settings. Berkowitz did not limit himself to a critique
History,Sociology,Psychology