Abstract:The crises of climate change and biodiversity loss are interlinked and must be addressed jointly. A proposed solution for reducing reliance on fossil fuels, and thus mitigating climate change, is the transition from conventional combustion‐engine to electric vehicles which currently requires additional mineral resources. Most options to meet this demand are associated with some biodiversity loss. One proposal is to mine the deep seabed, a vast, relatively pristine and mostly unexplored region of our planet. We present a framework that facilitates a holistic comparison of relative ecosystem impacts by mining, using empirical data from relevant environmental metrics. The crises of climate change and biodiversity loss are interlinked and must be addressed jointly. A proposed solution for reducing reliance on fossil fuels, and thus mitigating climate change, is the transition from conventional combustion‐engine to electric vehicles. This transition currently requires additional mineral resources, such as nickel and cobalt used in car batteries, presently obtained from land‐based mines. Most options to meet this demand are associated with some biodiversity loss. One proposal is to mine the deep seabed, a vast, relatively pristine and mostly unexplored region of our planet. Few comparisons of environmental impacts of solely expanding land‐based mining versus extending mining to the deep seabed for the additional resources exist and for biodiversity only qualitative. Here, we present a framework that facilitates a holistic comparison of relative ecosystem impacts by mining, using empirical data from relevant environmental metrics. This framework (Environmental Impact Wheel) includes a suite of physicochemical and biological components, rather than a few selected metrics, surrogates, or proxies. It is modified from the "recovery wheel" presented in the International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration to address impacts rather than recovery. The wheel includes six attributes (physical condition, community composition, structural diversity, ecosystem function, external exchanges and absence of threats). Each has 3–5 sub attributes, in turn measured with several indicators. The framework includes five steps: (1) identifying geographic scope; (2) identifying relevant spatiotemporal scales; (3) selecting relevant indicators for each sub‐attribute; (4) aggregating changes in indicators to scores; and (5) generating Environmental Impact Wheels for targeted comparisons. To move forward comparisons of land‐based with deep seabed mining, thresholds of the indicators that reflect the range in severity of environmental impacts are needed. Indicators should be based on clearly articulated environmental goals, with objectives and targets that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time bound.

The Development of Environmental Impact Assessments for Deep-Sea Mining

Revisiting procedural requirements for the assessment of environmental impacts arising from the different stages of deep seabed mining: Current practices at the International Seabed Authority and recommendations for improvement

Undermining by Mining? Deep Seabed Mining in Light of International Marine Environmental Law

Part I Assessing the UN Institutional Structure for Global Ocean Governance: The UN’s Role in Global Ocean Governance, 3 Advancing the Deep Seabed ‘Mining Code’: Key Environmental Elements of the Regulatory Framework for the Commercial Exploitation of Mineral Resources

Marine exploration and its environmental impact assessment: insights from international standards

Ecosystem-based Management through the lenses of International Seabed Authority stakeholders: current status, implications, and opportunities for the deep-sea mining regime in the Area

Implementing adaptive management in deep seabed mining: Legal and institutional challenges

The current status of deep-sea mining governance at the International Seabed Authority

Incorporating ecosystem services into environmental management of deep-seabed mining

Defining “serious harm” to the marine environment in the context of deep-seabed mining

Does the Regime Secure the Common Heritage’s Benefit-sharing and Marine Environmental Protection Components?

Comprehensive Understanding of Seafloor Disturbance and Environmental Impact Scenarios

An Overview of Seabed Mining Including the Current State of Development, Environmental Impacts, and Knowledge Gaps

Planning Sustainable Deep Sea Mining

Deep seabed mining: Frontiers in engineering geology and environment

Comparing environmental impacts of deep‐seabed and land‐based mining: A defensible framework

Self-governance at depth: The international seabed authority and verification culture of the deep-sea mining industry

Deep-sea mining poses an unjustifiable environmental risk

Seabed Mining and Approaches to Governance of the Deep Seabed

Area-based management tools to protect unique hydrothermal vents from harmful effects from deep-sea mining: A review of ongoing developments

DEEP-SEA mining: Policy options to preserve the last frontier - Lessons from Antarctica’s mineral resource convention