Comparison of two mainstream endometrial preparation regimens in vitrified–warmed embryo transfers after PGT
Yu Fu,Dongjia Chen,Bing Cai,Yan Xu,Shuhua Zhu,Chenhui Ding,Yali Wang,Jing Wang,Rong Li,Jing Guo,Jiafu Pan,Yanhong Zeng,Yiping Zhong,Xiaoting Shen,Canquan Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.009
IF: 4.567
2022-02-01
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Abstract:Research questionWhich of the two mainstream endometrial preparation regimens, assisted natural cycle (NC) and hormone replacement treatment cycle (HRT), can help frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles after preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) achieve better clinical outcomes?DesignThis retrospective analysis included 3400 frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles after PGT from January 2011 to November 2020, and involved 2332 patients with regular menstrual cycles. The decision to proceed with an assisted NC (n=827) or HRT (n=2573) before FET was reached based on a combination of patient preference and physician guidance. Clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, early miscarriage rate, and obstetric outcomes were compared.ResultsNo significant difference was observed between the assisted NC and HRT groups in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (51.6% vs. 50.7%, P=0.634), live birth rate (44.0% vs. 43.4%, P=0.746), and early miscarriage rate (12.6% vs. 12.0%, P=0.707). Multivariate analysis indicated that the endometrial preparation protocol was not an independent factor for a clinical pregnancy or live birth. In the HRT group, the caesarean section rate (64.7% vs. 51.9%, P<0.001) and pregnancy complication rate (20.2% vs. 13.8%, P=0.003) was significantly higher. The two groups were similar with respect to gestational age, early preterm birth rate, foetal weight, and foetal birth defect rate.ConclusionsFor patients undergoing an PGT-FET cycle involving a single blastocyst transfer, using assisted NC and HRT for the endometrial preparation could lead to comparable rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth. Additionally, NC is safer than HRT in terms of avoiding pregnancy complications and adverse obstetric outcomes.
obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology