Comparison of Embryo Transfer Techniques in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Cycles [35K]

Sarah Ligon,Kimberly Ann Chaffin,Bruce D. Pier,Gary Levy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog/01.aog.0000559229.73438.de
2019-05-01
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Different transfer techniques have been developed to optimize the embryo transfer process and maximize the probability of pregnancy after transfer. The purpose of this study is to compare the afterload (AL) embryo transfer technique and the post-mock (PM) embryo transfer technique. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study which included women who underwent an autologous, fresh or cryopreserved embryo transfer (ET) between 01 July 2013 and 01 September 2016 at our academic center. Embryo transfer was performed with either the afterload technique (AL) or the immediate post-mock (PM) transfer technique. The primary outcome of interest was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) defined as fetal cardiac activity on first trimester ultrasound. This study was approved by the Tripler Army Medical Center Department of Clinical Investigation Scientific Review Committee and Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in OPR between patients that underwent AL transfers and PM transfers (AL 51%, PM 57%; P=.378). Ongoing pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfers was superior for AL transfers compared to PM transfers (AL 68%, PM 31%; P=.005). Ongoing pregnancy rate was superior with the PM technique for fresh embryo transfers (AL 43%, PM 63%; P=.002). Ongoing pregnancy rate decreased with age in the AL cohort, but not in the PM cohort (P=.004). CONCLUSION: There appears to be no overall difference in OPR between AL and PM transfer technique. However, with vitrified embryos, the AL technique demonstrated a higher OPR, and with fresh embryos, the PM technique resulted in a superior OPR.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?