Blood flow restriction attenuates surface mechanomyography lateral and longitudinal, but not transverse oscillations during fatiguing exercise
Ethan C Hill,Christopher E Proppe,Paola M Rivera,Sean Lubiak,David H Gonzalez-Rojas,John E Lawson,Hwan Choi,Hansen A Mansy,Joshua L Keller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad360b
2024-03-21
Physiological Measurement
Abstract:Objective. Surface mechanomyography (sMMG) can measure oscillations of the activated muscle fibers in three axes (i.e., X-, Y-, and Z-axes) and has been used to describe motor unit activation patterns (X-axis). The application of blood flow restriction (BFR) is common in exercise studies, but the cuff may restrict muscle fiber oscillations. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the acute effects of submaximal, fatiguing exercise with and without BFR on sMMG amplitude in the X-, Y-, and Z-axes among female participants. Approach. Sixteen females (21±1years) performed two separate exercise bouts to volitional exhaustion that consisted of unilateral, submaximal (50% maximal voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC]) intermittent, isometric, leg extensions with and without BFR. sMMG was recorded and examined across percent time to exhaustion (%TTE) in 20% increments. Separate 2-way repeated measures ANOVA models were constructed: (Condition [BFR, non-BFR]) × (Time [20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 %TTE]) to examine absolute (m·s-2) and normalized (% of pretest MVIC) sMMG amplitude in the X-(sMMG-X), Y-(sMMG-Y), and Z-(sMMG-Z) axes. Main Results. The absolute sMMG-X amplitude responses were attenuated with the application of BFR (mean±SD= 0.236±0.138m·s-2) relative to non-BFR (0.366±0.199m·s-2, collapsed across Time) and for sMMG-Y amplitude at 60-100% of TTE (BFR range=0.213-0.232m·s-2 vs. non-BFR=0.313-0.445m·s-2). Normalizing sMMG to pretest MVIC removed most, but not all the attenuation which was still evident for sMMG-Y amplitude at 100% of TTE between BFR (72.9±47.2%) and non-BFR (98.9±53.1%). Interestingly, sMMG-Z amplitude was not affected by the application of BFR and progressively decreased across %TTE (0.332±0.167m·s-2 to 0.219±0.104m·s-2, collapsed across Condition.) Significance. The application of BFR attenuated sMMG-X and sMMG-Y amplitude, although normalizing sMMG removed most of this attenuation. Unlike the X- and Y-axes, sMMG-Z amplitude was not affected by BFR and progressively decreased across each exercise bout potentially tracking the development of muscle fatigue.
engineering, biomedical,biophysics,physiology