Abstract:Background: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training restricts arterial inflow and venous outflow from the extremity and can produce gains in muscle strength at low loads. Low-load training reduces joint stress and decreases cardiovascular risk when compared with high-load training, thus making BFR an excellent option for many patients requiring rehabilitation. Indications: Blood flow restriction has shown clinical benefit in a variety of patient populations including healthy patients as well as those with osteoarthritis, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, and Achilles tendon rupture. Technique Description: This video demonstrates BFR training in 3 clinical areas: upper extremity resistance training, lower extremity resistance training, and low-intensity cycling. All applications of BFR first require determination of total occlusion pressure. Upper extremity training requires inflating the tourniquet to 50% of total occlusion pressure, while lower extremity exercises use 80% of total occlusion pressure. Low-load resistance training exercises follow a specific repetition scheme: 30 reps followed by a 30-second rest and then 3 sets of 15 reps with 30-seconds rest between each. During cycle training, 80% total occlusion pressure is used as the patient cycles for 15 minutes without rest. Results: Augmenting low-load resistance training with BFR increases muscle strength when compared with low-load resistance alone. In addition, low-load BFR has demonstrated an increase in muscle mass greater than low-load training alone and equivalent to high-load training absent BFR. A systematic review determined the safety of low-load training with BFR is comparable to traditional high-intensity resistance training. The most common adverse effects include exercise intolerance, discomfort, and dull pain which are also frequent in patients undergoing traditional resistance training. Severe adverse effects including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and rhabdomyolysis are exceedingly rare, less than 0.006% according to a national survey. Patients undergoing BFR rehabilitation experience less perceived exertion and demonstrate decreased pain scores compared with high-load resistance training. Conclusion: Blood flow restriction training is an effective alternative to high-load resistance training for patients requiring musculoskeletal rehabilitation for multiple disease processes as well as in the perioperative setting. Blood flow restriction has been shown to be a safe training modality when managed by properly trained physical therapists and athletic trainers.

Affective, perceptual and physiologic responses to isokinetic contractions under blood flow restriction

Increase in calf post-occlusive blood flow and strength following short-term resistance exercise training with blood flow restriction in young women

Very-low-load resistance exercise in the upper body with and without blood flow restriction: cardiovascular outcomes

Physiological Responses to Acute Cycling With Blood Flow Restriction

Effects of load matched isokinetic versus isotonic blood flow restricted exercise on neuromuscular and muscle function

Blood flow in humans following low-load exercise with and without blood flow restriction

Influence of Blood Flow Restriction on Neuromuscular Function and Fatigue During Forearm Flexion in Men

Acute Neuromuscular and Microvascular Responses to Concentric and Eccentric Exercises With Blood Flow Restriction

Low-load Resistance Exercise with Perceptually Primed Practical Blood Flow Restriction Induces Similar Motor Performance Fatigue, Physiological Changes, and Perceptual Responses Compared to Traditional Blood Flow Restriction in Males and Females

Acute neuromuscular, cardiovascular, and muscle oxygenation responses to low-intensity aerobic interval exercises with blood flow restriction

Muscle Adaptations to High-Load Training and Very Low-Load Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction

Blood flow restriction increases motor unit firing rates and input excitation of the biceps brachii during a moderate-load muscle action

The Acute Physiological Responses to Traditional vs. Practical Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise in Untrained Men and Women

Blood flow restriction augments exercise-induced pressure pain thresholds over repetition and effort matched conditions

Blood flow restriction augments the cross-education effect of isometric handgrip training

The Discrepancy Between External and Internal Load/Intensity during Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Understanding Blood Flow Restriction Pressure as Modulating Factor

A Moderate Blood Flow Restriction Pressure Does Not Affect Maximal Strength or Neuromuscular Responses

An examination of acute psychophysiological responses following blood flow restriction exercise using a traditional research device or novel, automated system

Low-load resistance training to task failure with and without blood flow restriction: muscular functional and structural adaptations

Acute impact of autoregulation of applied blood flow restriction pressures on bilateral single-joint upper limb resistance exercise

Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Impact on Musculoskeletal Strength and Mass