Abstract:A key challenge for Earth system models is improving the representation of plant functional diversity. Experiments with vegetation demographic models show that water limitation leads to divergence between tree allocation strategies that are most competitive versus those that maximize biomass or productivity in monoculture. Earth system models (ESMs) have a limited capacity to represent plant functional diversity and shifts in trait distributions. Approaches to improving the representation of this complexity in ESMs include (i) optimality‐based approaches that predict trait–environment responses and (ii) explicitly modelling coexistence and community assembly. These approaches are expected to converge only when optimality‐based approaches identify competitively dominant strategies, which often differ from strategies that maximize ecosystem functioning or fitness components in monoculture. We used two models, LM3‐PPA (a vegetation demographic model designed as an ESM component) and BiomeE (a computationally efficient analog for LM3‐PPA), to explore how water limitation affects carbon allocation strategies of canopy trees. We compared competitive allocation strategies and those that maximize biomass or productivity in monoculture. We did not explicitly model coexistence or community assembly. Rather, we used model experiments to identify competitive and maximizing strategies in a two‐dimensional trait space under different precipitation and mortality scenarios. At 10 eastern US locations, we simulated historical, wet and dry climate scenarios, novel drought and three different mortality scenarios (low, medium or high sensitivity to water deficit). For each site and scenario, we identified the competitive strategy and three maximizing strategies (maximum biomass, productivity or drought‐tolerance). Root: leaf ratios tended to increase and leaf area tended to decrease with increasing water stress (increasing water limitation and its effects on mortality). However, relative to maximizing strategies, competitive strategies shifted towards greater allocation to roots and leaves with increasing water stress. Competitive overinvestments (greater allocation to roots and leaves by competitive strategies compared with maximizing strategies) were robust across different modelling contexts, including vegetation parameter sets (Acer vs. Populus), models (LM3‐PPA vs. BiomeE) and uncalibrated vsersus calibrated BiomeE versions. Synthesis: The theoretical prediction that competitive and maximizing allocation strategies differ under water limitation is confirmed for a demographic model designed as an ESM component. Optimality‐based trait predictions can simplify representing trait diversity in ESMs but do not always correspond to competitive outcomes. Explicitly modelling coexistence and community assembly in ESMs is challenging but is likely the most general approach to representing trait diversity.

Climate and plant trait strategies determine tree carbon allocation to leaves and mediate future forest productivity

Variation in leaf morphological, stomatal, and anatomical traits and their relationships in temperate and subtropical forests

The role of climate, foliar stoichiometry and plant diversity on ecosystem carbon balance

A moving target: trade‐offs between maximizing carbon and minimizing hydraulic stress for plants in a changing climate

Leveraging plant hydraulics to yield predictive and dynamic plant leaf allocation in vegetation models with climate change

Predicting vegetation type through physiological and environmental interactions with leaf traits: evergreen and deciduous forests in an earth system modeling framework

Optimising height-growth predicts trait responses to water availability and other environmental drivers

Carbon allocation in early successional tree species at elevated air humidity and different soil nitrogen sources

Forest carbon allocation modelling under climate change

Does economic optimisation explain LAI and leaf trait distributions across an Amazon soil moisture gradient?

Optimization can provide the fundamental link between leaf photosynthesis, gas exchange and water relations

Effects of water limitation and competition on tree carbon allocation in an Earth system modelling framework

Plant hydraulics coordinated with photosynthetic traits and climate

Community assembly influences plant trait economic spectra and functional trade-offs at ecosystem scales

Leaf habit and plant architecture integrate whole-plant economics and contextualize trait–climate associations within ecologically diverse genus Rhododendron

'How to adapt forests?'—Exploring the role of leaf trait diversity for long‐term forest biomass under new climate normals

Adaptive Carbon Allocation by Plants Enhances the Terrestrial Carbon Sink

Storage of carbon reserves in spruce trees is prioritized over growth in the face of carbon limitation

Leaf economics and hydraulic traits are decoupled in five species-rich tropical-subtropical forests

Improved process representation of leaf phenology significantly shifts climate sensitivity of ecosystem carbon balance

Climate warming could free cold-adapted trees from C-conservative allocation strategy of storage over growth