Abstract:A key challenge for Earth system models is improving the representation of plant functional diversity. Experiments with vegetation demographic models show that water limitation leads to divergence between tree allocation strategies that are most competitive versus those that maximize biomass or productivity in monoculture. Earth system models (ESMs) have a limited capacity to represent plant functional diversity and shifts in trait distributions. Approaches to improving the representation of this complexity in ESMs include (i) optimality‐based approaches that predict trait–environment responses and (ii) explicitly modelling coexistence and community assembly. These approaches are expected to converge only when optimality‐based approaches identify competitively dominant strategies, which often differ from strategies that maximize ecosystem functioning or fitness components in monoculture. We used two models, LM3‐PPA (a vegetation demographic model designed as an ESM component) and BiomeE (a computationally efficient analog for LM3‐PPA), to explore how water limitation affects carbon allocation strategies of canopy trees. We compared competitive allocation strategies and those that maximize biomass or productivity in monoculture. We did not explicitly model coexistence or community assembly. Rather, we used model experiments to identify competitive and maximizing strategies in a two‐dimensional trait space under different precipitation and mortality scenarios. At 10 eastern US locations, we simulated historical, wet and dry climate scenarios, novel drought and three different mortality scenarios (low, medium or high sensitivity to water deficit). For each site and scenario, we identified the competitive strategy and three maximizing strategies (maximum biomass, productivity or drought‐tolerance). Root: leaf ratios tended to increase and leaf area tended to decrease with increasing water stress (increasing water limitation and its effects on mortality). However, relative to maximizing strategies, competitive strategies shifted towards greater allocation to roots and leaves with increasing water stress. Competitive overinvestments (greater allocation to roots and leaves by competitive strategies compared with maximizing strategies) were robust across different modelling contexts, including vegetation parameter sets (Acer vs. Populus), models (LM3‐PPA vs. BiomeE) and uncalibrated vsersus calibrated BiomeE versions. Synthesis: The theoretical prediction that competitive and maximizing allocation strategies differ under water limitation is confirmed for a demographic model designed as an ESM component. Optimality‐based trait predictions can simplify representing trait diversity in ESMs but do not always correspond to competitive outcomes. Explicitly modelling coexistence and community assembly in ESMs is challenging but is likely the most general approach to representing trait diversity.

Optimising height-growth predicts trait responses to water availability and other environmental drivers

Explaining plant trait variation in response to soil water availability using an optimal height-growth model

Multiple time scale optimization explains functional trait responses to leaf water potential

Does economic optimisation explain LAI and leaf trait distributions across an Amazon soil moisture gradient?

Optimality principles explaining divergent responses of alpine vegetation to environmental change

Coordination of plant hydraulic and photosynthetic traits: confronting optimality theory with field measurements

Optimization can provide the fundamental link between leaf photosynthesis, gas exchange and water relations

Predicting vegetation type through physiological and environmental interactions with leaf traits: evergreen and deciduous forests in an earth system modeling framework

Climate and plant trait strategies determine tree carbon allocation to leaves and mediate future forest productivity

A moving target: trade‐offs between maximizing carbon and minimizing hydraulic stress for plants in a changing climate

Constraints To Vegetation Growth Reduced By Region-Specific Changes In Seasonal Climate

Coordinated Responses of Leaf and Absorptive Root Traits under Elevated CO2 Concentration in Temperate Woody and Herbaceous Species

Drought response in herbaceous plants: A test of the integrated framework of plant form and function

Linking plant functional trait plasticity and the large increase in forest water use efficiency

Effects of water limitation and competition on tree carbon allocation in an Earth system modelling framework

Towards a unified theory of plant photosynthesis and hydraulics

Scaling Between Stomatal Size and Density in Forest Plants

Eco‐evolutionary optimality as a means to improve vegetation and land‐surface models

How eco-evolutionary principles can guide tree breeding and tree biotechnology for enhanced productivity

CO2 and temperature effects on morphological and physiological traits affecting risk of drought-induced mortality

The stomatal response to rising CO2 concentration and drought is predicted by a hydraulic trait-based optimization model