Abstract:The prebiotics like FOS and GOS are receiving special attention in the food industry due to their health benefits. They can be produced by enzymatic synthesis by using disaccharides or other substrates as raw materials or by extraction and hydrolysis from different natural sources (roots, legumes). The environmental footprints of these different production schemes are lacking to provide guidance for the ecodesign of such new production processes. In this work, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was undertaken to analyze and compare the production of FOS and GOS by enzymatic synthesis from glucose (to get FOS) or lactose (to get GOS) and hydrolytic production from extraction of yacon potato (to get FOS) or chickpea (to get GOS). A cradle-to-gate approach was considered in the two scenarios under assessment (the phases of use and/or final disposal of FOS/GOS were not considered). The functional unit was defined as 100 g of FOS/GOS produced. LCAs were performed using data collected at the laboratory scale, supplemented with data from Ecoinvent database. SimaPro was used for the LCA modeling with the midpoint impact EF2.0 characterization method. Results showed that the main environmental hotspot was the production of yacon potato or chickpea used in the hydrolysis process. For this reason, the hydrolytic process caused higher environmental burdens than the enzymatic synthesis process. Chickpea production causing more impacts than yacon potato production, GOS production generated more environmental impacts than FOS production. When produced by enzymatic synthesis, FOS and GOS were the sources of similar environmental impacts. From a process point of view, special attention must be paid on three specific stages of production: time of synthesis, freeze-drying and purification of the final product. The environmental load of these stages was associated to high energy consumption and huge amount of ethanol requirement. The results from this study helped to identify the stages requiring special efforts to ecodesign the production of FOS and GOS at pilot scale in the future. Further research should primarily be focused in the reduction of the biomass used and corresponding solid waste generated during the hydrolytic production. Furthermore, environmental assessment should be included at each development of the process to ensure its efficient eco-design.

Comparison of immobilized and free enzyme systems in industrial production of short‐chain fructooligosaccharides from sucrose using a techno‐economic approach

Optimization and Comparison of the Production of Galactooligosaccharides Using Free or Immobilized Aspergillus Oryzae Β-Galactosidase, Followed by Purification Using Silica Gel.

Economic analysis and environmental impact assessment of three different fermentation processes for fructooligosaccharides production

Immobilised Inulinase from Aspergillus niger for Fructose Syrup Production: An Optimisation Model

Techno‐economic analysis of inulooligosaccharides, protein, and biofuel co‐production from Jerusalem artichoke tubers: A biorefinery approach

Optimization of simultaneous saccharification and isomerization of dextrin to high fructose syrup using a mixture of immobilized amyloglucosidase and glucose isomerase

Sustainable Co-Production of Xylanase, Cellulase, and Pectinase through Agroindustrial Residue Valorization Using Solid-State Fermentation: A Techno-Economic Assessment

Experimental and Technoeconomic Assessment of Monosaccharide and Furan Production under High Biomass Loading without Solid–Liquid Separation

A Critical Review on Immobilized Sucrose Isomerase and Cells for Producing Isomaltulose

Construction and investigation of multi-enzyme immobilized matrix for the production of HFCS

Environmental performance of new processes for the production of fructo-and galacto-oligosaccharides (FOS and GOS)

Tailored chitosan integration in diatomaceous earth particles as a scaffold for fructosyltransferase immobilization in fructo-oligosaccharide production

Economical production of isomaltulose from agricultural residues in a system with sucrose isomerase displayed on Bacillus subtilis spores

From sucrose to fructo-oligosaccharides: Production and purification of fructo-oligosaccharides by an integrated enzymatic catalysis and membrane separation process

Production of 2,5‐furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA) from starch, glucose, or high‐fructose corn syrup: techno‐economic analysis

Transformation of sugarcane molasses into fructooligosaccharides with enhanced prebiotic activity using whole-cell biocatalysts from Aureobasidium pullulans FRR 5284 and an invertase-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae 1403-7A

IMMOBILIZATION OF A MICROBIAL FRUCTOSYLTRANSFERASE ON BIOCHAR AND BIOCHAR FUNCTIONALIZED WITH GLUTARALDEHYDE AIMING AT FRUCTOOLIGOSSACHARIDES PRODUCTION

Fructooligosaccharides production by immobilized Pichia pastoris cells expressing Schedonorus arundinaceus sucrose:sucrose 1-fructosyltransferase

Aspergillus welwitschiae inulinase enzyme cocktails obtained on agro-material inducers for the purpose of fructooligosaccharides production

Cost-Effective Optimization of the Transfructosylation Activity of an Invertase Produced from Aspergillus carbonarius PC-4 Using Pineapple Crown and Determination of Its Biochemical Properties

Process optimization, purification, and characterization of cellulase from Aspergillus uvarum and its industrial application in saccharification