Techno‐economic analysis of inulooligosaccharides, protein, and biofuel co‐production from Jerusalem artichoke tubers: A biorefinery approach

Oscar K. K. Bedzo,Mohsen Mandegari,Johann F. Görgens
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2105
2020-05-09
Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
Abstract:<p>Jerusalem artichoke (JA) is a crop with excellent potential for application in biorefineries. It can resist drought, pests, and diseases and can thrive well in marginal lands with little fertilizer application. The JA tubers contain considerable quantities of inulin, which is suitable for the production of inulooligosaccharides (IOS), as a high‐value prebiotic, dietary fiber. In this study, five JA tuber biorefinery scenarios were simulated in Aspen Plus® and further evaluated by techno‐economic and sensitivity analyses. Production of IOS, proteins and animal feed was studied in scenarios A and C, applying various biorefinery configurations. Scenario B explored the option of producing only IOS and the sale of residues as animal feed. Scenarios D and E investigated the economic potential of biofuel generation from residues after IOS and protein production by generation of biogas and ethanol respectively, from residues. Based on the chosen economic indicators, scenario B resulted in the lowest minimum selling price (MSP) of 3.91 US$ kg<sup>−1</sup> (market price 5.0 US$ kg<sup>−1</sup>) with correspondingly reduced total capital investment (TCI) and total operating cost (TOC) per mass unit produced of IOS of 18.91 and 2.59 US$ kg<sup>−1</sup> respectively, compared with other studied scenarios. Considering the set production scale, it is more profitable when the residues are sold as animal feed instead of being converted into biofuel, due to the capital‐intensive nature of the biofuel production processes. The coproduction of protein had a negative impact on the economics of the process as the associated capital and operating expenditure outweighed the associated revenue. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?