Abstract:Background: Governments and policy makers struggle to achieve a balance between hierarchical steering and horizontal governance in systems characterized by fragmented decision authority and multiple interests. To realize its One Citizen-One Journal eHealth policy vision, the Norwegian government established a special eHealth board of stakeholders to create an inclusive governance model that aligned stakeholders' interests with the government's ambitions through coordination and consensus. Little empirical knowledge exists on how countries realize inclusive governance models. Objective: This study aims to investigate how the Norwegian inclusive eHealth governance model was developed as a tool to align the government's policy ambitions with stakeholders' concerns from January 2012 to December 2022. Methods: This document study used a thematic analysis based on a constructivist research approach. We included 16 policy documents and 175 consultation response documents issued between January 2012 and December 2022 related to the Norwegian One Citizen-One Journal policy implementation process. The themes were constructed deductively from a review of governance models and public governance theory and were applied as our analytical lens to each document. The findings were interpreted, analyzed, and synthesized. Results: The national policy implementation process progressed through 3 phases, with changes in stakeholder inclusion and perceived influence on the decision-making process characterizing transitions from phase to phase. Tension developed between 2 contrasting views regarding top-down government authority and stakeholders' autonomy. The view of the regional health trusts, municipalities, health care professional organizations, and industry actors contrasted with that of the patient organizations. Governmental insensitivity to participation, lack of transparency, and decreasing trust by stakeholder groups challenged the legitimacy of the inclusive governance model. Conclusions: We illustrated that Norway's One Citizen-One Journal policy trajectory was characterized by a process that unfolded across 3 distinct phases. The process was characterized by 2 contrasting stakeholder perspectives. Finally, it was shaped by diminishing trust in the inclusive governance model. The National eHealth Governance Board faced challenges in establishing legitimacy as a top-down inclusive governance model, primarily attributed to its addressing of participation, transparency, and trust dilemmas. Such dilemmas represent significant obstacles to inclusive governance models and require ongoing governmental vigilance and responsiveness from governmental entities.

Multi-stakeholder initiatives, policy learning and institutionalization: the surprising failure of open government in Norway

Investigating the Norwegian eHealth Governance Model: Document Study

The Public Legitimacy of Multistakeholder Partnerships in Global Environmental Governance: Evidence from Survey Experiments in Brazil, the United Kingdom, and the United States

Learning in International Governmental Organizations

Policy learning in collaborative environmental governance processes

Participation, Coordination, Agreement...Action? Evaluating the Multistakeholder Model in Internet Governance

Multistakeholder Initiatives and Sustainability? A Governance Analysis using the German Initiative on Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO) as a Case Study

Institutional Capacity-building in Urban Planning and Policy-making for Sustainable Development: Success or Failure?

Navigating Input and Output Legitimacy in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Institutional Stewards at Work

A Legitimate Form of Governance? Examining Public-Private Partnerships in International Environmental Politics

Collaboration in Open Government Data Ecosystems: Open Cross-sector Sharing and Co-development of Data and Software

Learning and employee-driven innovation in the public sector – the interplay between employee engagement and organisational conditions

Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance: the open method of co-ordination in innovation policy

Studying open government data: Acknowledging practices and politics

Why do Open Government Data initiatives fail in developing countries? A root cause analysis of the most prevalent barriers and problems

Open innovation and public administration: transformational typologies and business model impacts

Unveiling the Mechanisms Behind Open Government Data Use: The Interplay of Internal Resources and Institutional Pressures

Governance lessons from Denmark's digital transformation

Public Sector Platforms going Open: Creating and Growing an Ecosystem with Open Collaborative Development

The survival of open government platforms: Empirical insights from a global sample

Evaluation of Multi-level Social Learning for Sustainable Landscapes: Perspective of a Development Initiative in Bergslagen, Sweden