The Internet shutdown muzzle(s) freedom of expression in Ethiopia: competing narratives

Yohannes Eneyew Ayalew
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1619906
2019-05-04
Abstract:Freedom of expression is a foundational stone for democracy and embraces a number of other rights, including – freedom to seek, receive, and impart information using any medium. Around 16 million Ethiopians, comprising 15.4% of the total population, use the Internet. The Ethiopian Internet shutdown saga has been marked by competing narratives. On one hand, the government has been using two governing narratives, i.e. national security narrative and 'economic growth' narrative to justify shutdowns of the Internet. But, the individuals' self-expressions on social media find itself as competing narrative. Since 2016, the Internet has been closed more than six times under the cloak of national security, quelling rising protests, controlling strikes, and exam cheating. As such, freedom of expression of millions has been muzzled. The article argues blanket Internet shutdowns do not meet the caveats of human rights law.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?