Abstract:Our integrated modelling method allows for managers to use citizen sightings combined with detection/non‐detection surveys to estimate robust indices of abundance for both high‐ and low‐density, and wide‐spread versus patchily distributed species. Through comparison with previous studies, we highlight how broad‐scale programmes, such as the statewide efforts to estimate species distributions undertaken here, can benefit substantively from integrated models that leverage additional data (here, incidental records) from a larger region of space, and thus capture more landscape heterogeneity than is plausible within formalized surveys alone. Estimating species distribution and abundance is foundational to effective management and conservation. Using an integrated species distribution model that combines presence‐only data from various sources with detection/non‐detection data from structured surveys, we estimated the distribution and expected abundance of three difficult‐to‐monitor mammals of management concern across New York State, namely, coyotes (Canis latrans), bobcats (Lynx rufus) and black bears (Ursus americanus). Three distinct landscape‐scale camera trap surveys provided detection/non‐detection data over 9 years between 2013 and 2021, and we augmented those data with incidental records of our focal species from public repositories. We used an inhomogeneous Poisson point process to construct an integrated model that fit both data types simultaneously. We demonstrate a simple application of spatial point density of all species records in the accessed public databases to inform the thinning process to account for unknown spatial sampling in the presence‐only data, often referred to as the 'magic covariate'. Using this approach, we examine habitat associations and provide spatially explicit estimates in expected abundance across the entirety of New York State for all three focal species. As expected, coyotes were the most widely distributed and abundant species, with a strong positive association with agricultural land uses. Bobcats exhibited low expected abundance throughout the state and showed positive associations with deciduous forest and forest edge, and a negative association with road density. Finally, we observed considerable spatial variation in abundance of black bears with expected abundance increasing in association with various forest cover and composition covariates and decreasing with crop cover. We present insights into habitat associations and spatial variation in abundance, and provide management implications for each of the species of interest. Synthesis and applications. Our integrated modelling method allows for managers to use citizen sightings combined with detection/non‐detection surveys to estimate robust indices of abundance for both high‐ and low‐density, and wide‐spread versus patchily distributed species. Through comparison with previous studies, we highlight how broad‐scale programmes, such as the statewide efforts to estimate species distributions undertaken here, can benefit substantively from integrated models that leverage additional data (here, incidental records) from a larger region of space, and thus capture more landscape heterogeneity than is plausible within formalized surveys alone.

Structuring the unstructured: estimating species-specific absence from multi-species presence data to inform pseudo-absence selection in species distribution models

Dealing with sampling bias and inferring absence data to improve distribution models of a widely distributed vulnerable marsupial

Presence-only species distribution models are sensitive to sample prevalence: Evaluating models using spatial prediction stability and accuracy metrics

Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence

Presence-only and Presence-absence Data for Comparing Species Distribution Modeling Methods

How to assess the prediction accuracy of species presence-absence models without absence data?

Can We Model the Probability of Presence of Species Without Absence Data?

Determining representative pseudo-absences for invasive plant distribution modeling based on geographic similarity

Integrating presence‐only and detection/non‐detection data to estimate distributions and expected abundance of difficult‐to‐monitor species on a landscape‐scale

Testing whether ensemble modelling is advantageous for maximising predictive performance of species distribution models

Solving sampling bias problems in presence–absence or presence‐only species data using zero‐inflated models

PRECISION AND BIAS OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POINT SURVEY DETECTION PROBABILITIES

Evaluating species distribution model predictions through time against paleozoological records

A comparison of joint species distribution models for presence–absence data

Without quality presence–absence data, discrimination metrics such as TSS can be misleading measures of model performance

Non-detection during excursions by citizen scientists modeled as a function of weather, season, list length, and individual preferences

How sensitive are species distribution models to different background point selection strategies? A test with species at various equilibrium levels

Integrated species distribution models: A comparison of approaches under different data quality scenarios

A Bayesian Model to Estimate Abundance Based on Scarce Animal Vestige Data

Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy

Measuring and comparing the accuracy of species distribution models with presence–absence data