Abstract:Purpose This study aims to explore the lived experience of loneliness among a group of people diagnosed with the contested diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In so doing, it contributes to works offering dimensional conceptualisations of personality disorders and contributes to loneliness study more broadly which has seen a rise in interest since the Covid-19 epidemic and the subsequent enforced isolation and the resultant new phenomenon of sudden loneliness. Design/methodology/approach Participants with diagnoses of BPD were recruited through a combination of calls through online fora and announcements at self-help groups. A total of 25 people made contact, with interviews eventually being carried out with 14 of these. They were invited to take part in unstructured, recorded one-to-one interviews. Thematic analysis was used in this study, which used a narrative phenomenological approach using an Arendtian lens. Findings Through attending to the interwoven themes in the narratives of trauma, loss and loneliness, it emerged that the enduring loneliness experienced was compounded by repeated instances of testimonial injustice. Research limitations/implications This study supports the need for a further deepening of our understanding of the complexity of experience at the interface of loneliness and mental ill health. Practical implications This study critiques the reductive assumptions behind websites, simplistic tool kits and training within the mental health arena dictating “what works” for loneliness. The paper argues for health professionals to develop a more nuanced listening to reported loneliness and that part of what may compound this complex experience among people diagnosed with personality disorder is epistemic injustice, rife within a climate of neoliberalism. Social implications Neoliberalism has been identified as a key driver of distinct shifts in mental health policy and the commodification of mental health. Its fixation with medicalisation and its drive to treat “mental illness” as a problem within the individual positions people as self-contained agents and downplays, or worse, ignores the social, cultural and economic dimensions that contribute to the person’s distress. Neoliberalism’s discourse of “responsibilization” for example, urges individuals that families, communities and workplaces rather than publicly funded services become the main resources to respond to in times of mental distress. This, however, assumes a concreteness to these institutions which may be illusory and leaves those in difficulty dependent on presumed immediate social circles. These circles, however, if they exist, may contain the very people who have failed individuals or subjected them to the testimonial injustices so often cited in the narratives of this research. Originality/value The Arendtian account of loneliness rests on the premise that the human being of contemporary society is afflicted with a sense of isolation and homelessness, further exacerbated in today’s neoliberal context. By drawing on this account, the enmeshed and complex nature of mental illness, loneliness and dislocation from society and the ways in which continued epistemic injustice negatively impact on mental well-being are laid bare. Phenomenology of loneliness goes some way to helping people without the devastating life experiences common to those diagnosed, rightly or not, with a personality disorder gain a sense of the experience, and this research argues for psychological practice to be more mindful of this literature and the value of closely heard first-person narratives.

Finding ways (and words) to move: Mad student politics and practices of loneliness

The dark side of moral outrage: Understanding the risks to long-term, meaningful community development work in higher learning

Tactics of resistance in student-student interaction

Rendering the paradoxes and pleasures of academic life: using images, poetry and drama to speak back to the measured university

Battles for occupied academic space

The international foundations of Mad Studies

Uncharted Territory: Delving into Unexplored Knowledge to Curb Ableism in Academia

The politics of mad femme disclosure

Margins as Methods, Margins as Ethics: A Feminist Framework for Studying Online Alterity

Belonging as situated practice

On Being Accepted: Interrogating How University Cultural Scripts Shape Personal and Political Facets of Belonging

Romanticizing decolonization and Asian epistemology: reflections on identity and space

Nomadic Ethics

Who knows? A Speculative Fabulation about Knowledge Politics at University and Ecological Subjectivities

Studying Up from the Margins in a white-supremacist-cis-hetero-patriarchal-capitalist culture

Power and pedagogic failure: Seeking a politics of empathy towards an anti-racist academy

The lonely legacy: loss and testimonial injustice in the narratives of people diagnosed with personality disorder

Epistemological process towards decolonial praxis and epistemic inequality of an international student

Youth Enacting Social-Spatial Justice in Middle School STEM: Advancing Justice Work in Hyperlocal and Interscalar Ways

Rebellion contagion: Embodying black radical love in the westernised academy

Belonging as flickering and in flux in academic work: a collective biography