Abstract:Recently, we had reported a synthetic positively charged leucine-rich 14-residue-long antimicrobial peptide (AMP, LL-14: NH3+-LKWLKKLLKWLKKL-CONH2), which was highly active and cytotoxic relative to its valine analogue (VV-14). However, the thermodynamics underlying this differential toxicity and antimicrobial activity was unclear. Understanding the energetics of peptide binding to micelles (simplest membrane mimic, viz., SDS as a bacterial membrane and DPC as a eukaryotic membrane) and the effect of Leu → Val peptide mutations on the stability of the peptide:micelle complexes are of great academic interest and relevant for the rational design of potent and selective AMPs for therapeutic use. Here, we have reported the molecular dynamics free energy simulations that allowed us to quantitatively estimate the strength of peptide discrimination (based on single- or multiple-site Leu/Val mutations in LL-14) by membrane mimetic micelles (SDS and DPC) and decipher the energetics underlying peptide selectivity by micelles. The Leu-containing peptide (LL-14) was found to be preferred for micelle (SDS and DPC) binding relative to its Val analogues (single or multiple Val mutants). The strength of the preference depended on the position of the Leu/Val mutation in the peptide. Surprisingly, the N-terminal LL-14 single mutation (Leu → Val: L1V) was found to fine-tune the electrostatic interactions, resulting in the highest peptide selectivity (ΔΔG ∼ 8 kcal/mol for both SDS and DPC). However, the mechanism of L1V peptide selectivity was distinctly different for SDS and DPC micelles. SDS ensured high selectivity by disrupting the peptide:micelle salt bridge, whereas DPC desolvated the broken-peptide-backbone hydrogen bond in the V1 peptide:micelle complex. Mutations (Leu → Val) in the middle positions of the LL-14 (4th, 7th, 8th, and 11th) were disfavored by the micelles primarily due to the loss of peptide:micelle hydrophobic interactions. Peptides differing at the C-terminal (i.e., L14V) were recognized by SDS micelles (ΔΔG ∼ 4 kcal/mol) by altering peptide:micelle interactions. L14V mutation, on the other hand, did not play any role in the peptide:DPC binding, as no direct interactions between the C-terminal and DPC micelle were observed due to obvious electrostatic reasons. The strength of selectivity favoring LL-14 binding against VV-14 was found to be much higher for DPC micelles (ΔΔG ∼ 25 kcal/mol) relative to SDS micelles (ΔΔG ∼ 19 kcal/mol). The loss of the peptide:micelle hydrophobic contact in response to LL-14 → VV-14 mutation was found to be significantly larger for DPC relative to SDS micelles, resulting in higher discriminatory power for the former. Peptide:SDS salt bridges seemed to prevent the loss of peptide:micelle hydrophobic contact to some extent, leading to weaker selectivity for SDS micelles. High selectivity of DPC micelles provided an efficient mechanism for VV-14 dissociation from DPC micelles, whereas low-selectivity of SDS micelles ensured binding of both LL-14 and VV-14. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which the experimental observations (antimicrobial activity and toxicity) between leucine-rich and valine-rich peptides have been explained by establishing a direct link between the energetics and structures.

Influence of Lipid Saturation, Hydrophobic Length and Cholesterol on Double‐Arginine‐Containing Helical Peptides in Bilayer Membranes

Control of the Transmembrane Orientation and Interhelical Interactions Within Membranes by Hydrophobic Helix Length

Phospholipid Membrane Interactions of Model Ac-WL-X-LL-OH Peptides Investigated by Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Influence of chirality and sequence in lysine-rich lipopeptide biosurfactants and micellar model colloid systems

Computational Investigations of Arginine‐Rich Peptides Interacting with Lipid Membranes

Hydrophobic Matching Mechanism Investigated by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Charge of a Transmembrane Peptide Alters Its Interaction with Lipid Membranes

Conformational and interfacial analyses of K3A18K3 and alamethicin in model membranes

Impact of lipidation site on the activity of α-helical antimicrobial peptides

Binding-induced lipid domains: Peptide-membrane interactions with PIP2 and PS

All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Elucidating Molecular Mechanisms of Single-Transmembrane Model Peptide Dimerization in a Lipid Bilayer

Amphiphilicity Is a Key Determinant in the Membrane Interactions of Synthetic 14-mer Cationic Peptide Analogues

Effect of Leu/Val Mutation on the Energetics of Antimicrobial Peptide:Micelle Binding

Influence of Detergent and Lipid Composition on Reconstituted Membrane Proteins for Structural Studies

Chain-Length Dependence of Peptide-Lipid Bilayer Interaction Strength and Binding Kinetics: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Approach

Arginine-Containing Surfactant-Like Peptides: Interaction with Lipid Membranes and Antimicrobial Activity

The Influence of Cholesterol on Membrane Targeted Bioactive Peptides: Modulating Peptide Activity Through Changes in Bilayer Biophysical Properties

Membrane association, electrostatic sequestration, and cytotoxicity of Gly-Leu-rich peptide orthologs with differing functions

Heterogeneous Structural Disturbance of Cell Membrane by Peptides with Modulated Hydrophobic Properties

Cationic Side Chain Identity Directs the Hydrophobically Driven Self-Assembly of Amphiphilic β-Peptides in Aqueous Solution

Alanine scan and (2)H NMR analysis of the membrane-active peptide BP100 point to a distinct carpet mechanism of action