Abstract:The study of cyber strategy and its implications for international security has become increasingly crucial, necessitating an examination of the unique challenges posed by the dynamic and stealthy nature of the cyber domain. This paper addresses whether offensive or defensive strategies prevail in cyberspace, especially in light of evolving technological landscapes and debates over cyber threats. By applying offense-defense theory from international relations, the research explores the nuanced relationship between offensive and defensive operations in cyberspace. Despite prevalent views favoring offense dominance, recent skepticism questions the severity of cyber threats and suggests a possible overemphasis on offensive operations. This paper systematically examines the core concepts, findings, and operational variables of offense-defense theory, providing clarity to the conceptual debates surrounding cyber conflict. Recognizing the unique characteristics of the cyber domain, it urges a careful consideration of biases that may distort judgments about offense dominance. The evolving nature of cyberspace and its potential for redesign introduces caution and underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the offense-defense balance. The preliminary assessment concludes that the question of whether offense or defense "dominates" in cyberspace is overly simplistic. Given the intricate interactions of cyber capabilities, other coercive means available to states, and the dynamic evolution of cyber technology, this question can only be answered within specific contextual and chronological boundaries. Within such conditions, the state of the offense-defense balance is crucial to tactical and operational decision-making. At the strategic policymaking level, the more coherent question is how cyber technologies are shifting the balance of advantages between offense and defense in the overall military posture of states. In essence, this paper provides valuable insights into the ongoing discourse on cyber strategy, theoretical frameworks, and nuanced analyses to inform policy and strategic decision-making in the face of evolving cyber threats.

Hedging in international relations: an introduction

Reassessing Hedging: The Logic of Alignment in East Asia

Theorising the Hedging Strategy: National Interests, Objectives, and Mixed Foreign Policy Instruments

Hedging in Academic Writing: Cross-disciplinary Comparisons in the Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP).

The nexus of security and economic hedging: Vietnam’s strategic response to Japan–China infrastructure financing competition

Indonesia’s South China Sea Policy: The Limits of Hedging

Persevering with bandwagoning, not hedging: why European security cooperation still conforms to realism

American Hegemony and European Independent Defense: Critique on the Balancing Theory Explanation

THE USE OF HEDGING DEVICES IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS ACADEMIC DISCOURSE: THE CASE OF READING IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH ARTICLES

Strategic Hedging and China’s Economic Policy in the Middle East

Hedges in Bidirectional Translations of Publicity-Oriented Documents

Conditional Hedging and Portfolio Performance

Strategy Under Uncertainty: International Conflict and Variation in Information

Achieving Realistic Levels of Defensive Hedging Based on Non-monotonic and Multi-attribute Terrorist Utility Functions

Hedging between the United States and China? South Korea’s ideology-driven behavior and its implications for national security

Measuring and Hedging Geopolitical Risk

Hedging in the Results and Discussion Section of English Applied Linguistics Research Articles by Vietnamese and Foreign Writers

Identification of Hedging Strategies in Business Negotiations

Hedging geopolitical risk with precious metals

The Offense-Defense Balance in Cyberspace

Optimal Static Quadratic Hedging